I shall be reporting it, because it hints at something messy underneath the cast member naming/reference resolving mechanism which is not particularly comforting.
I think there is a difference between both names.
although the output after the automatic string conversion yields the same result, the 'value' of the name of member, which was not yet specified is void, where the other is EMPTY.
put string(EMPTY) -- "" put string(void) -- ""
I did not ever notice that, but I wouldn't call it a bug at all.
if you name a member "" and later get back this member reference, where is the problem ?
it even is more accurate than I ever would expect it to be.
--
||| a�ex --
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
