As far as I know, you can't take the quad of the source. -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Buzz Kettles Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2004 21:38 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: <lingo-l> copypixels on quads
have you tried using the quad of the source? -Buzz At 9:16 PM +0200 5/26/04, you wrote: >Now that Tom Higgins and other gurus are on board, please allow me to bring >my question up again (see below). I posted this during the weekend and got >no replies, maybe it was the wrong time! > >So, if any of you guys has an answer, thanks in advance for posting it! > >Best regards >Michael > > > >-----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- >Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Michael von >Aichberger >Gesendet: Samstag, 22. Mai 2004 17:57 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: <lingo-l> copypixels on quads > > >Hi List! > >I have to use the copypixels command to copy a rectangular source image into >a non-rectangular (quad) image using something like > >pointL = [point(825, 712), point(2269, 592), point(2452, 1365), point(861, >1515)] > targetImg.copyPixels(sourceImg, pointL, sourceImg.rect]) > >The result is very pixelated. > >I compared > > targetImg.copyPixels(sourceImg, pointL, sourceImg.rect], [#useFastQuads : >TRUE]) > targetImg.copyPixels(sourceImg, pointL, sourceImg.rect], [#useFastQuads : >FALSE]) > targetImg.copyPixels(sourceImg, pointL, sourceImg.rect], [#dither : 1215]) > targetImg.copyPixels(sourceImg, pointL, sourceImg.rect], [#dither : 1969]) > >but got NO different results. All resulting images look the same: very >nasty! > (Dir 8.5.1, win2k) > >At least the #useFastQuads thing is officially documented. Why could it be >that I get no different results? > >Has anyone of you tested those and the other two parameters and found them >work differently? > >When I make my quad operation to a significantly (x 2, x 3) larger image and >scale that down afterwards, the results are a little better, but still poor. >Not comparable to the smoothness of those images, distorted in Photoshop. > >Do I have to live with that or is there any way of getting Photoshop quality >in Director? > >Thanks to all who'd share their experience! > >Michael > > > > > > >[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to >http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is >for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!] > >[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go >to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the >list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email >[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with >programming Lingo. Thanks!] [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!] [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
