>Hello,
>
>
>I have to convince the technical staff and managing staff of my company
>that MUS and director 8 is better suited for doing collaborating stuff
>(sharing a graphical white-board, do some processing on images,
reinject
> into the server, and so on...) that NetMeeting.
>
>The managing staff like the idea of a Microsoft product, free moreover,
>which comes without plug-in and integrates seamlessly with IE5 browser.
>
>The technical staff argues with me on the real-time and
>videoconferencing. I reply they can't do image processing and reinject
>on the server...
>Well, yes indeed they said with the 'SDK and channel' programming
>instaling a server-side COM component which, they said is impossible
>with MUS and shockwave.
>
> Can you help me to counterargue these points :
>- sharing applications
>- performance issue (real-time)
>- security issue
>- standard compliance (Netmmeeting 3 whiteboard T.120 I think)
>- no plug-in to download
>- existence of a SDK
>- video-conferencing
>- deployment on an intranet of 3000 computers
>
>If no, is it foreseen in Director 9
>
>
> Help
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Tony
>
> Intranet and multiledia consultant
>
>[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
>http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
>email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
>
>
>
>
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
