At 01:54 1/12/01, John Kanding wrote: >Before I dig into it, has anyone already done the work of comparing lingo >to actionscript and created a table like: I haven't heard of one. If you can make it go both ways I could sure use it. Something like a ActionScript-Lingo, Lingo-ActionScript dictionary for use when in foreign territory ;-) -- Mark A. Boyd Keep-On-Learnin' :) [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- <lingo-l> Fatal Error Jonathan
- Re: <lingo-l> Fatal Error Kerry Thompson
- RE: <lingo-l> Fatal Error Jonathan
- RE: <lingo-l> Fatal Error Kerry Thompson
- Re: <lingo-l> Fatal Error Mark A. Boyd
- Re: <lingo-l> Fatal Error edi Nehani
- Re: <lingo-l> Fatal Error ... Mark A. Boyd
- Re: <lingo-l> Fatal Error Ken Huynh
- <lingo-l> netscape bugs wi... Brian Douglas
- <lingo-l> flash 5(action s... John Kanding
- RE: <lingo-l> flash 5(acti... Mark A. Boyd
- RE: <lingo-l> flash 5(acti... Karina Steffens
- <lingo-l> linked jpegs adam
- <lingo-l> Made with Macromedia logo??? Jayson
- Re: <lingo-l> Made with Macromedia ... Jake Sapirstein
- Re: <lingo-l> transparent stage mine
- <lingo-l> speech ITS
- RE: <lingo-l> speech Mark R. Jonkman
