At 16:25 -0500 01_01_24, Patrick Griffiths wrote:
>Close enough I guess, but not the same. By using the goofiness below the
>property can be accessed through the me instance of the script and through
>the script. That would be like accessing a static through this and through
>scope resolution. IMHO that doesn't make much sense, but whatever...
Well, I think the facts speak for themselves.
I provided a working solution, which is elegant enough for me, and I
hope it will serve the purposes of the initial requester, as I think
it is capable of, within Lingo's special set of restrictions and
flexibilty.
I do mind having my contributions called "goofiness" as I think you
would, so lets keep a polite tone, OK?
Regards, Jakob
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]