25 images in 0.76 s => 32 fps. Pretty good for a non-hi-end machine!
I guess it takes some time to load from disk and decompress, when
playing standard video.
-Andreas
>>I don't know
>>how 'fast' the animation will be though - showing 800x600x24 images @
>>high frame rate is pretty heavy duty...
>
>Hi Andreas!
>
>Thanks for your suggestions. I tried it out and it works fine:
>
>On a 400 MHz Pentium II machine (with 512 MB RAM) those 25 800x600x24 images
>take 0,76 seconds, which is faster and better than uncompressed realtime
>video!
>
>Michael von Aichberger
>
>
>
>[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
>http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
>email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
