I agree with you both - I'm not talking stealth - I'm talking about
working around complacency. Its USAID stuff to USAID field staff ...
which means people who simply DON'T send evaluations, simply DON'T
respond to emails ... they are all over the world and my main concern is
that they wouldn't have the connection at the moment and having to
interact with the interface would interrupt their useage.
Tanya
Al Hospers wrote:
>
> > fwiw, some people might have a problem with any application that
> > sends tracking data without the user's consent. I know I would.
>
> I didn't mention this in my previous postings, but I agree with Roy here. if
> you are planning on sending this stuff you SHOULD have consent. in fact many
> people have personal firewalls these days like BlackIce which tells you if
> something is trying to send out an unauthorized communication.
>
> Al Hospers
> CamberSoft, Inc.
> al<at>cambersoft<dot>com
> http://www.cambersoft.com
>
> A famous linguist once said:
> "There is no language wherein a double
> positive can form a negative."
>
> YEAH, RIGHT
>
> [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
> http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
