Absolute concurrence here - I suppose the main requirement of the
accessor methods is to supply/set the data required in such a way that
the object can be perceived as a "black box". ie you should be able to
change the implementation of the method without affecting any other
objects that make calls to the method. As long as the method continues
to take the same arguments, and return the same results we have achieved
this...
Pete
On Friday, August 17, 2001, at 02:50 PM, Karina Steffens wrote:
> <Snip Al's post>
>
>>
>> what do you think?
>
> I absolutely agree with everything you just said :)
>
> Karina
>
>
>
>
> [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
> http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
>
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
