At 4:30 PM -0700 10/25/01, Buzz Kettles wrote: >It's been suggested before (many times). >But certainly another entry in wishlist can't hurt. > >But I would also suggest that it's not going to happen. > >Director already has enough trouble trying to figure out how to do >single UNDOs because there are so many simultaneously editable >windows (Stage, Cast, Score, Script, Message, member editors, etc.). > >The QA effort to verify such a feature prohibits implementation.
note: I forget to mention that this was my OPINION. :) >hth > >-Buzz > >At 9:05 AM -0400 10/25/01, Brian Romanko wrote: >>Ahh Rajiv, a fine question indeed. Might I suggest asking it to: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] I always thought it was because we >>Director programmers never make more than one mistake, so what's the >>need? >> >>Is it really to early to wish for Director X? >> >>Brian Romanko >>Lead Developer - Neo/SCI Corporation >>Member - Greater Rochester Macromedia User Group >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>Hi List, >>Why director doesn't allow more then one undo operation.? >> >>Rajiv [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
