I've also had similar trouble mixing traditional timeout handlers and 
new timeout objects. Maybe they are incompaible?

Cole


>I'm working on a kiosk where I'm making use of plenty of timeout objects to
>fire off events.
>
>But, we'd also like to throw this puppy into an attract loop if no-one has
>been playing with it for a while.
>
>It appears that I'm going to have to roll my own routine for checking for
>inactivity, because the timeouthandler I set is getting called every time I
>create a new TimeOut object.
>
>So, these two timeout methods are either incompatible, or I'm doing
>something wrong....
>
>roymeo

[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]

Reply via email to