The rollout that’s even worse than the vaccine debacle

By Elizabeth Farrelly  June 12, 2021 ― 
https://www.theage.com.au/environment/sustainability/the-rollout-that-s-even-worse-than-the-vaccine-debacle-20210610-p58011.html


Again and again it comes back to a single core issue: self-loathing government.

Australia, with coal-export CO2 larger than the whole of Germany’s, faces the 
G7 this weekend as a global emissions pariah. Electric vehicles are an easy 
part of the remedy. But take-up is microscopic.

Why? Because we wallow in an abject policy vacuum. Because when government no 
longer believes in governing, true leadership becomes impossible.

When government worships only corporate gods; when it thinks strong governance 
involves kissing up and kicking down, when in the same week it toadies to the 
mining lobby and denies a desperately ill three-year-old medical treatment for 
political reasons, it’s all over.

Many aver that we need a federal ICAC. But when our federal government mopes in 
its pink, poster-covered bedroom wishing to be a blustering tycoon when it 
grows up it doesn’t have to be corrupt, because it has been ideologically 
corrupted.

Electric vehicles are a no-brainer. Everyone’s talking zero carbon by 2050. 
Even Scott Morrison inches this way. But when the PM told mining executives 
last week that we’ll take “the Frank Sinatra approach” to net-zero, we’ll “do 
it our way in Australia”, it was clear what he meant. Do nothing.

Scott Morrison likes to invoke the “animal spirits of capitalism”.

The phrase, from Hobbes, Emerson, Austen and others, was made famous by Maynard 
Keynes. Morrison uses it to offer pagan flattery �C as if business leaders in 
Perth or Sydney were our fierce tribes of Viking warriors �C while casting 
capitalism as a natural force, benevolent and sacrosanct.

Capitalism, the suggestion goes, will take us to zero emissions with no help 
from government.

This, no doubt, is “our way”. It’s the lazy-as-she-goes approach, like digging 
up coal and selling it, like watching TV with a tinnie and calling that sport. 
It is, “she’ll be right, mate”.   But will she?

Transport produces some 19 per cent of Australia’s emissions. EVs reduce this 
by around 40 per cent, even if the electricity is from coal. If it’s renewable, 
then emissions fall to zero.

True, they’re still cars, and the car has other attendant downsides. Even EVs 
worsen sprawl, devour farmland, destroy community, nurture ego and coarsen 
perception. But unless we truly think Australia can cold-turkey its 
car-addiction, EVs must be top of our to-do list. Will the market take us there?

Many brands are now available and driving range is up to 400 kilometres. In the 
US, EV popularity is huge, with Ford reporting 45,000 orders for its new F-150 
Lightning all-electric ute within 48 hours of release. Here, EVs sit at a 
meagre 0.75 per cent, and take-up is dropping.

Other countries are all over this. Norway, despite its huge oil interests, has 
nearly 75 per cent electric vehicles. Britain has 10 per cent and proposes 
(alongside India, Japan, Thailand and Germany) to ban the sale of internal 
combustion vehicles by 2040. In the US, President Biden (Congress willing) 
proposes to invest $174 billion into growing the EV market, including tax 
incentives and 500,000 charging stations by 2030.

Here, with a hotch potch of rules and regulations, it’s classic Australiana. 
Too much government, not enough leadership.

The ACT offers free rego and no stamp duty for zero-emissions cars, and 
no-interest household loans of $15,000. Victoria offers a $100 rego discount 
and a $3,000 purchase subsidy, but taxes EVs on road use. Queensland and the 
Northern Territory offer reduced rego. Tasmania put $600,000 into a charging 
network. South Australia promises $13 million for a charging network.

In NSW, Transport Minister Andrew Constance did at least oppose Dominic 
Perrottet’s lunatic proposal last year to tax electric vehicles, in the 
meantime anyway. Basically they’ll wait until enough of us have them. There’s a 
maximum $30 discount on registration (huh?) and Constance now says he’ll 
provide green power to trains and purify WestConnex by electrifying all buses 
(and “eventually” all vehicles.) But the high, unsubsidised cost of EVs and 
dearth of charging infrastructure puts many people off.

It’s a clear case for overall policy direction. There are many tools available; 
tax incentives, regulatory clarity, technical and legal guidance, capital 
investment in charging infrastructure. But the essence is simple. We want these 
things: how can we make them happen?

Yet even compared with the roll-out of vaccines, the chain-dragging and 
buck-passing in EV rollout has been slow-to-imbecilic.

In 2019 Scott Morrison promised us an EV strategy that would “coordinate action 
across governments, industry and urban and regional communities, and will 
include considering whether mandating an electric-vehicle plug type could 
improve the consistency of public charging.”

Within weeks, he was attacking Labor’s proposal to use tax exemptions to grow 
EVs to 50 per cent of all new car sales by 2030 as a proposal to “end the 
weekend”. Since then? Nada.

What should happen? Charging is critical. Right now, Chargefox has some 700 
stations around the country (some fast, some ultra-fast) and Ausgrid has 
prototyped its plan to convert its 13,000 green power-boxes to charging 
stations. But this needs a huge kick start.

Many people cannot charge at home (although the Owners Corporation Network has 
a great package of advice and assistance for apartment owners wrangling strata 
bodies). A powerpoint plug-in takes all night but an ultra-fast charger gives 
you 400 kilometres in 15 minutes. These should be everywhere, on every street, 
with reserved parking.

It’s pretty simple. We should take the target seriously. Zero emissions by 2050 
is not “preferable”, as Morrison now says. Let’s actually commit. Let’s have a 
five-year moratorium on EV rego, stamp duty and road tax. Let’s roll out 
ultra-fast public charging stations across the country, 20 a week.

Scott Morrison may deride the eco-credentials of “inner-city″ types. He may 
stand against the G7. But we inner-city types, and they, the G7, are singing 
the same. We’re here to help. But you need to come out of your bedroom, Scott.

Where the bloody hell are ya?

--

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to