Online Privacy Becomes Critical If Roe v. Wade Is Overturned

Women will flock to the Dark Web and encrypted messaging apps to circumvent new 
abortion restrictions.

But some of those tools are under threat.

By Parmy Olson, Bloomberg Opinion. May 4, 2022  https://archive.ph/WCmzV


About 10 years ago, a story about Target Corp.’s uncanny ability to detect a 
customer’s pregnancy made waves.

An angry man had gone into a Target store in Minneapolis, demanding to speak to 
a manager and flashing coupons that his teenage daughter had received in the 
mail for baby clothes and cribs. “Are you trying to encourage her to get 
pregnant?” he asked.

It turned out his daughter was already pregnant, and Target had figured this 
out before he had.

Data mining by companies has only improved since then, but fortunately so have 
our tools for protecting privacy.

A leaked draft ruling reported by Politico suggests the U.S. Supreme Court is 
in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1974 decision that gave women 
the right to abortion.

This would make online privacy more critical than ever for women and 
health-care providers, as secrecy around abortion would become integral not 
just for personal reasons but to avoid potential legal ramifications or 
blowback from vigilantes.

It’s unclear who would be legally liable for an abortion in close to a dozen or 
more U.S. states that would like to ban it.

But many women will want to hide their online activity out of caution. 
Democratic Senator Ron Wyden warned on Tuesday that “every digital record — 
from web searches, to phone records and app data — will be weaponized in 
Republican states as a way to control women’s bodies.”

One of the first things many women do when they find themselves needing an 
abortion is seek advice online. That won’t change no matter what the Court 
rules.

But if they happen to live in one of 22 states that would probably outlaw 
abortion in the absence of Roe vs. Wade, they’d be wise to hide their browsing 
history and use encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal to talk to 
others about their plans.

Should abortion pills also be outlawed, women may turn to the Dark Web to 
procure them — something they already do, according to this study from the 
University of Texas.

Women may also turn to VPNs to stop mobile network providers and search engines 
from seeing their browsing habits. They’ll clear their web histories, use 
incognito windows or download more privacy-focused browsers like Firefox.

Such tools, normally associated with political dissidents in autocratic 
regimes, could become far more important for American women in a post-Roe vs. 
Wade world.

Tech news site Motherboard reported on Monday that a location-data firm has 
already been selling information related to people’s visits to abortion 
clinics, including where visitors had come from and how long they stayed, by 
tracking apps on groups of phones.

The Internet presents risk, but also help, such as telemedicine services that 
offer abortion medication. Many women in the U.S. have flocked to services like 
Aid Access to acquire such medication; the website “Women on Web” offers 
services to women around the world. Depending on the location, pills can cost 
approximately $90, versus $600 or more to get the procedure done in a clinic, 
prohibitively expensive for many of the women who need abortions (most of whom 
live on or below the poverty line).

Online collectives like the “Auntie Networks” of Facebook will also become 
increasingly important.

These are pages run by people offering a spare room in U.S. states where 
abortion is legal, for women who need the procedure.

A 2019 report in the Washington Post described how some Auntie Network pages 
suggested taking selfies at local landmarks as “proof” that the trip was just a 
vacation. One host in Iowa said they’d be “happy to mail you a birthday card,” 
which contained birth control, a Plan B pill or a pregnancy test.

Well-meaning as these initiatives are, this is sensitive information being 
hosted by a social-media company that’s already being used by third parties, in 
this case advertisers.

In the meantime, a forthcoming law in the European Union that reins in the 
power of large technology companies may have the unintended consequence of 
making people’s data in the U.S. more vulnerable to surveillance.

The EU’s Digital Markets Act, which will come into effect in the next few 
years, forces the world’s biggest digital companies to make their products 
compatible with those of competitors. That means messaging apps like WhatsApp 
will need to co-exist with less-secure services like SMS.

But some cryptography experts say that making these tools interoperable will 
break their encryption standards, which could put women seeking an abortion at 
greater risk.

Social-media and search platforms have for years been exploited by the 
surveillance advertising industry.

How much will they resist future government efforts to enforce abortion bans? 
What happens if state prosecutors order Facebook or Google to identify women 
who are breaking the rules?

Given the libertarian ethos of many Silicon Valley billionaire founders and the 
legal fallout from whistleblower Edward Snowden, it’s hard to see such firms 
giving in to government demands to break their encryption and hand over such 
details. But put enough financial pressure on a business and anything can 
happen.

For now, encryption and online privacy tools are a sacred right for women 
seeking an abortion. They mustn’t turn into a luxury.

To contact the author of this story:
Parmy Olson at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Nicole Torres at [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to