Commerce Department Revises Export Rules to Boost US Standards Development on 
Critical Tech

https://www.nextgov.com/policy/2022/09/commerce-revises-export-rules-boost-us-standards-development-critical-tech/376911/

September 8, 2022


The original rule—which banned certain entities from receiving U.S. 
exports—endangered U.S. participation in international standards bodies where 
such entities are present, opponents said.

The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security drew praise from 
industry leaders for nixing a license requirement to release technology 
controlled by Export Administration Regulations—so long as it is for 
“standards-related activity.”

“This interim final rule … amends the Export Administration Regulations to 
authorize the release of specified items subject to the EAR without a license 
when that release occurs in the context of a ‘standards-related activity,’ as 
defined in this rule,” reads a notice set to publish in the Federal Register 
Friday.

The revised rules come as public and private-sector officials alike continue to 
bemoan lackluster involvement in standards development organizations for 
critical emerging technologies, which may threaten national security if they 
got into the wrong hands.


“International standards bodies are critically important when we talk about 
things like 5G, 6G, crypto standards, cloud security standards ... the U.S. 
needs to have more of an active presence in these standards bodies,” Morgan 
Adamski, chief of the National Security Agency’s Cybersecurity Collaboration 
Center, said during a panel at the Billington conference Wednesday.

“We are currently outnumbered four to one by the Chinese.”


The original rule, issued toward the end of the Trump administration, followed 
Commerce’s addition of Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei and related 
entities to its list of those banned from receiving exports of U.S. technology 
without a special license.

Industry commenters and other leaders in the cybersecurity community—including 
from academia where broad early-stage collaboration is crucial--pushed back 
saying it would undermine national security by chilling participation in 
international standards bodies where they must interact with Huawei and other 
banned entities.

BIS has since tried to allow for standards participation by issuing a temporary 
general license—now expired—and narrowly defining the kinds of technologies and 
organizations that wouldn’t require its authorization for engagement. The 
updated rule goes further, which industry leaders cheered.

“BIS agrees with the commenters that additional actions are needed to protect 
U.S. technological leadership without discouraging, and indeed supporting and 
promoting, the full participation of U.S. actors in international standards 
development efforts,” the notice reads. “The national security threat that 
results from ceding U.S. participation and leadership in standards development 
and promulgation outweighs the risks related to the limited release of certain 
low-level technology and software to parties on the Entity List in the context 
of a “standards-related activity.”

BIS is seeking comment over the next 60 days on the updated rule which defines 
“standards-related activity” as “activities required for the development, 
adoption or application of a standard, where there is an intent to publish the 
resulting standard.”

“As the United States seeks to enhance its technological leadership, ensuring 
globally-engaged companies maintain their seat in international standards 
setting bodies is essential to competing with foreign contenders like China,” 
Naomi Wilson, the Information Technology Industry Council’s vice president of 
policy for Asia, said in a press release Thursday. “We appreciate the 
department’s ongoing engagement and willingness to work with industry on this 
critical issue to ensure that national security is safeguarded without 
inhibiting U.S. industry’s competitiveness and global leadership.”
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to