Hi Jan
They have been trying a watermark:
https://docs.kanaries.net/articles/chatgpt-watermark
But there are already potential workarounds.
Gerard
On 29/7/23 09:32, Jan Whitaker wrote:
Wouldn't it be simpler to embed a metadata element that identified the
source of an output from one of the generators? Including which one,
when, for whom (trickier if local installation) and possibly a unique
generation code for that item? I realise that wouldn't work for screen
shots or copy/past text (at least I can't see how that could be
stopped), but at least the original could be coded as such so if there
were any challenges to authenticity, there could be tracking for it.
Or maybe that won't scale.
On 29/07/2023 12:23 am, Stephen Loosley wrote:
Less than seven months later, the project was scrapped.
"As of July 20, 2023, the AI classifier is no longer available due to
its low rate of accuracy," OpenAI wrote in a recent blog. "We are
working to incorporate feedback and are currently researching more
effective provenance techniques for text."
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
