On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 17:36 +1100, Kim Holburn via Privacy wrote: > They pointed to the associated discussion paper which “clearly states > that the standards do not require service providers to design > systematic vulnerabilities or weaknesses into encrypted services”.
The discussion paper is completely irrelevant as far as I know; the wording of the actual legislation is all that counts (IANAL of course). > Feedback on the draft standards is open until 21 December. This kind of timing is egregiously bad faith. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
