On 03/01/2024 19:49, Narelle Clark wrote:
> From the November issue of the IEEE Communications Magazine there are some 
> papers on 'Semantic Communication': "In contrast to the Shannon paradigm that 
> focuses on correct reception of the transmitted packet regardless of its 
> meaning, semantic communication is concerned with the issue of how to 
> efficiently transmit and receive the desired meaning of the source content to 
> the destination. By transmitting only the meaning or semantics of the source 
> content, semantic communication holds the promise of making wireless networks 
> significantly more energy-efficient, robust, and sustainable than ever 
> before."
>
> Just what we need embedded in everything, huh? AI determining the "meaning" 
> and summarising the lower layer communications for more efficient 
> transmission.

I can think of an even more efficient way of communicating: forget about all 
those difficult theoretical concepts like Shannon's Equation or Entropy, and 
let the listener just assume they know what the human at the other end is 
saying!  Why bother about physics, it's all too difficult and too hard to 
market.

I must be feeling in a cynical mood this morning.

"Semantic communication" is quite often known as poetry, which conveys its 
message by conjuring the listener's emotions and imagination, their shared 
experience of life, and their empathy for others.

However humans have been developing such understanding and mental capacity one 
way and another since the dawn of sentient life, and the human brain began its 
evolution perhaps two million years ago.  Furthermore, human cerebral reactions 
cannot be separated from the rest of the body's biochemistry, such as the 
endocrine system, the sympathetic & para-sympathetic nervous system, and so on.

This is essentially why AI machines should be conceived (by humans!) as fast 
correlation processors.  That's not to deny they're an extremely important 
technology with vast potential to improve the lot of humanity, and also to 
destroy it.  I don't agree that AI is some sort of technology bubble which will 
just disappear given time.

Yes?  No?
_
David Lochrin_
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to