On 27/05/2024 10:48, Marghanita da Cruz wrote: Interesting..should we be recycling, reusing or extending the life of materials we use..
> On 25/5/24 00:01, Stephen Loosley wrote: >> 'Absolute miracle' breakthrough provides recipe for zero-carbon cement >> >> By Michael Irving May 23, 2024 >> https://newatlas.com/materials/concrete-steel-recycle-cambridge-zero-carbon-cement/ >> >> [Photo] “Old concrete can be recycled in furnaces used to recycle steel, in >> a new method that drastically reduces the CO2 emissions of both” Cambridge >> University > I imagine matching the demand for concrete & steel with the supply of pre-loved concrete might be an issue though. And I hope the Cambridge team will take into account the implicit greenhouse load presented by supporting processes if their idea were adopted on a commercial basis. We never hear proponents of nuclear energy talking about the greenhouse load created by building a reactor (lots of concrete!), mining & refining the fuel, transporting used fuel rods to Europe or the US for processing, transporting the waste back again and then disposing it locally. Not to mention the implicit strategic risk. Decentralised and distributed is the way to go IMHO. _David Lochrin_ _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
