Send Link mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Link digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Bluesky: ?a place of joy?: why scientists are joining the
rush to Bluesky (Stephen Loosley)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:10:08 +1030
From: Stephen Loosley <[email protected]>
To: "link" <[email protected]>
Subject: [LINK] Bluesky: ?a place of joy?: why scientists are joining
the rush to Bluesky
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
?A place of joy?: why scientists are joining the rush to Bluesky
Researchers say the social-media platform ? an alternative to X ? offers more
control over the content they see and the people they engage with.
By Smriti Mallapaty 22 November 2024
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03784-6
[Photo caption: A smartphone displaying the icon for the Bluesky social media
app, in front of a computer screen featuring a Bluesky feed. Bluesky has been
growing rapidly since 2023.Credit: Matteo Della Photo/Shutterstock]
Researchers are flocking to the social-media platform Bluesky, hoping to
recreate the good old days of Twitter.
?All the academics have suddenly migrated to Bluesky,? says Bethan Davies, a
glaciologist at Newcastle University, UK. The platform has ?absolutely
exploded?.
In the two weeks since the US presidential election, the platform has grown
from close to 14 million users to nearly 21 million.
Bluesky has broad appeal in large part because it looks and feels a lot like X
(formerly known as Twitter), which became hugely popular with scientists, who
used it to share research findings, collaborate and network. One estimate
suggests that at least half a million researchers had Twitter profiles in 2022.
That was the year that billionaire Elon Musk bought the platform. He renamed it
X and reduced content moderation, among other changes, prompting some
researchers to leave. Since then, pornography, spam, bots and abusive content
have increased on X, and community protections have decreased, say researchers.
Musk has responded about some of these issues on X. In March he posted,
?Stopping crypto/porn spam bots is not easy, but we?re working on it.?
Bluesky, by contrast, offers users control over the content they see and the
people they engage with, through moderation and protections such as blocking
and muting features, say researchers. It is also built on an open network,
which gives researchers and developers access to its data; X now charges a
hefty fee for this kind of access.
Several similar social-media platforms have also sprung up, including Mastodon
and Threads, but they haven?t gained the same traction among academics as
Bluesky.
Mass migration
Daryll Carlson, a bioacoustics researcher at the University of New Hampshire in
Durham, says she noticed the largest influx of users on Bluesky after the US
election. Musk has become closely aligned to president-elect Donald Trump. For
Carlson, Bluesky offers a space to engage with other scientists, as well as
artists, photographers and the general public. ?I?d really like it to continue
to be a place of joy for me,? she says.
On the platform, users scroll through feeds ? curated timelines of posts on
specific subjects. Users can like feeds, pin them to their homepage or request
to share content on them.
One of the most popular is the Science feed, where scientists and science
communicators share content. It?s been liked by more than 14,000 users and gets
400,000 views a day, according to the feed?s manager, a user named Bossett. So
far, it has 3,600 contributors, from ecologists and zoologists to quantum
physicists, but those numbers are increasing rapidly.
To become a contributor, users need to share evidence of their research
credentials with a moderator. Mae Saslaw, a geoscientist at Stony Brook
University in New York, vets requests to post on the feed from people in
geoscience and has seen an increase from one a week to half a dozen per day. As
an early-career researcher, Saslaw has found Bluesky useful for learning about
new software, finding interesting papers and applying for jobs.
Safe space
For many researchers, the move to Bluesky has been about gaining back control
over what appears in their timelines. Feeds are one example, but the platform
also offers options to filter out content such as nudity and spam, or specific
phrases, from appearing in their timelines.
Bluesky also offers a feature that users have nicknamed the ?nuclear block?,
which prevents all interaction with blocked accounts ? an option no longer
available on X. And users can create and subscribe to regularly updated
collaborative block lists, such as lists of offensive accounts. If a user
subscribes to one of these, no content from those accounts will appear on their
timelines.
Cl?ona Murray, a neuroscientist at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut,
says the protections offered by BlueSky are appealing. Murray was very
entrenched in X. She co-founded an organization to diversify neuroscience,
called Black in Neuro, which started in part there. But she began to feel that
X was not a safe place.
Bluesky offers ?starter packs? ? user-created custom lists of accounts for new
joiners to follow. Murray created one called Blackademics U.K.; she also notes
the work of Rudy Fraser, an open-source developer who created a collection of
feeds called Blacksky. This pack includes a moderation tool with which users
can report content that is racist and anti-Black or contains misogynoir ?
expressing hatred particularly against Black women ? and filter them out.
But as Bluesky grows, the problems that plague X could come to haunt it, too,
say researchers. ?There?s definitely a risk that bad-faith actors will move in;
bots will move in,? says Davies.
?With any huge wave of growth, there?s going to be a wave of spam and scam as
well,? says Emily Liu, who manages growth, communications and partnerships at
Bluesky in San Francisco, California. ?We?ve scaled up our trust and safety
team; hired more moderators to help combat all of this.?
Leave or stay
Some researchers, such as Axel Bruns, a digital-media researcher at Queensland
University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia, are keeping their Twitter
accounts to avoid losing them to impersonators. Others have shut their accounts
down.
Madhukar Pai, a tuberculosis researcher at McGill University in Montreal,
Canada, says he has lost some 1,000 followers in the exodus (he still has
98,000). But he is reluctant to leave. ?If good experts quit X, who will offer
evidence-based input on X??
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03784-6
Update 22 November 2024: This story has been updated to include public comments
from Elon Musk on X and a source for data on Bluesky's Science feed.
--
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
------------------------------
End of Link Digest, Vol 384, Issue 20
*************************************
