Send Link mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Link digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. "It is beyond time ACMA puts consumers first and treats telco
as an essential service" (Stephen Loosley)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 14:23:52 +1030
From: Stephen Loosley <[email protected]>
To: "link" <[email protected]>
Subject: [LINK] "It is beyond time ACMA puts consumers first and
treats telco as an essential service"
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Letting telcos regulate themselves isn't working for consumers
A coalition of consumer advocates is calling for direct government oversight.
"It is beyond time ACMA puts consumers first and treats telco as the essential
service it is by putting an end to the self-regulatory system that has been in
place for too long and harmed too many."
By Andy Kollmorgen Last updated: 27 October 2025
https://www.choice.com.au/electronics-and-technology/phones/mobile-phones/articles/advocates-call-to-scrap-the-tcp-code
Need to know ..
* The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman's 2024?25 annual report is just
the latest indicator that industry self-regulation is falling short
* Hardship complaints to the ombudsman went up 46% compared to the previous 12
months, while complaints about poor mobile coverage jumped 25%
* The Fair Call Coalition is calling on the federal regulator to scrap the
industry-devised Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code and move to
direct regulation
If you're wondering why telcos in Australia seem to fail their customers so
often without facing a major regulatory overhaul, consider the
Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code.
The name conveys a weighty sense of legislative power, but in fact the code was
created by the industry itself, and the government body that oversees the
sector ? the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) ? merely
reviews and approves it.
It theoretically has the force of law at that point, but in the last two years
ACMA has taken action on TCP Code violations only three times. In each case,
the punishment was light ? the telcos were formally instructed to comply with
the code. (ACMA took a number of other regulatory actions over that time for
violations of other industry codes, standards and acts.)
"Hardship complaints to the ombudsman went up 46% compared to the previous 12
months"
The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman's (TIO) 2024?25 annual report
contains a fresh batch of evidence that the TCP Code isn't working as intended,
especially for customers in financial trouble.
Hardship complaints to the ombudsman went up 46% compared to the previous 12
months, a statistic that calls for some historical perspective. Telco customers
often end up missing payments because they were sold services they couldn't
afford by pushy salespeople, as was the case when Optus targeted First Nations
and other vulnerable customers with inappropriate products and services and
sent debt collectors after them when they couldn't pay.
(The company was hit with a $100 million penalty for the conduct in September
this year in a case brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer
Commission (ACCC), not ACMA. In 2021, an ACCC case arising from similarly
unconscionable practices resulted in a $50 million penalty for Telstra.)
"The evidence is overwhelming, mis-selling, misleading coverage claims and
poor handling of financial hardship are systemic industry issues" ACCAN CEO
Carol Bennett
The Optus and Telstra examples are high profile cases that are part of a larger
pattern across the industry, according to Australian Communications Consumer
Action Network (ACCAN) CEO Carol Bennett. In her view, the latest TIO report
proves matters are only getting worse.
"The TIO's findings confirm what we are hearing every day ? that poor sales
practices and inadequate safeguards are hurting consumers, particularly those
who are already vulnerable. The evidence is overwhelming: mis-selling,
misleading coverage claims and poor handling of financial hardship are systemic
industry issues."
According to ACCAN's research, 43% of consumers don't trust their mobile or
home internet provider to act in their best interest, 30% say the coverage they
receive is different to what they were told, and 21% report feeling pressured
to sign up for a more expensive plan than they wanted. Then there's the quality
of the service you get, especially on our most frequently used devices.
Complaints to the TIO about poor mobile coverage rose 25% in 2024?25.
Read more: Push for Optus to be forced to prevent further triple-0 failures
Advocates urge ACMA to scrap the code
After an industry review that took over two years, an updated TCP Code was
submitted to ACMA for registration in May this year. The regulator recently
rejected this updated version, but consumer advocates have had enough of ACMA's
light touch approach to the telco sector.
In September this year, the Fair Call Coalition ? an alliance of 20 consumer
organisations ? called on ACMA to scrap the industry's self-regulatory code and
move to direct regulation, especially when it comes to essential telco consumer
protections, such as hardship provisions.
To an extent, direct regulation is already in place. In July this year, ACMA
rolled out enforceable industry standards for consumers experiencing domestic
and family violence.
In September this year, the Fair Call Coalition ? an alliance of 20 consumer
organisations ? called on ACMA to scrap the industry's self-regulatory code and
move to direct regulation
The guidance in the TCP Code is for telcos to offer flexible repayment options
to family violence victims 'where possible'. But this guidance alone clearly
wasn't enough to protect those impacted by family violence ? telcos often made
the situation worse for victims and their children beyond the issue of debt.
When a victim tried to deal with a telco on their own to keep their services
active, companies often insisted that the abuser take part in the process. The
new enforceable standards aim to address these issues.
"Under these rules, customers will not have to repeatedly explain their
circumstances and will be able to choose the time and method for communication
with their telco. Importantly, these customers will also be able to access this
assistance confident that they will never be asked to engage with the alleged
perpetrator to resolve their telco issues," ACMA chair Nerida O'Loughlin said
in July.
Consumer protections groups have called on the federal regulator to scrap the
industry-devised code in favour of direct regulation.
Pressure sales, flimsy credit checks
But there are still no enforceable standards in areas of longstanding consumer
harm such as sales practices and credit assessments, and telco customers
continue to be upsold on services that are financially inappropriate for their
circumstances.
"ACMA must demonstrate that it has the backbone to stand up for consumers. It
is simply not acceptable to keep accepting a deeply flawed self-regulatory code
that has proven to have failed consumers," Bennett says.
Other members of the Fair Call Coalition are in agreement.
"Calls to Mob Strong Debt Help about telcos tripled in the last year ? showing
the impact on First Nations peoples from telco failures," says Mob Strong
senior financial counselling and strategy lead Bettina Cooper.
"It is time for our consumer protection framework to be upgraded to reflect how
essential telco services are for our lives" Consumer Policy Research Centre
CEO Erin Turner
"We have seen harm done to First Nations people before when regulators shy away
from their responsibilities and protecting First Nations people's financial
rights."
"It is clear that self-regulation isn't working in the telco sector," says
Consumer Policy Research Centre (CPRC) CEO Erin Turner.
"In 2024, CPRC found that 55% of Australians had a problem with a telco
service, yet nearly half of this group (46%) didn't raise their complaint as
they don't trust telcos to hear them out and fix problems. It is time for our
consumer protection framework to be upgraded to reflect how essential telco
services are for our lives."
Financial Counselling Australia director of policy and campaigns Rebekah
Sarkoezy says financial counsellors regularly "support clients who are
struggling with unaffordable debt due the bad sales practices and poor
affordability checks of telcos. They deserve adequate protection, and
self-regulation simply just doesn't cut it".
The telco industry as a whole has failed to appropriately support customers in
hardship.
ACMA knows the TCP Code is failing
Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) obtained documents
through Freedom of Information requests that reveal just how slow ACMA is
moving on the key issues affecting telco customers, chief among them sales
practices, credit assessments, and financial hardship support.
Though heavily redacted, they show that ACMA committed to moving to direct
regulation by the end of 2023 unless the TCP Code started effectively dealing
with these issues, which it clearly has not.
Email exchanges between ACMA chair Nerida O'Loughlin and the communications
industry peak body, the Australian Telecommunications Alliance, in September
2024 reveal that ACMA had serious concerns about the TCP Code's guidance on
sales practices.
ACMA seemingly held the industry's hand to chart a course to avoid direct
regulation
ACCAN statement
"Despite this, ACMA seemingly held the industry's hand to chart a course to
avoid direct regulation," ACCAN said in a joint Fair Call Coalition statement,
adding that the FOI documents "paint a picture of a regulator who recognises
ongoing consumer harm, yet through delays and inaction continues to tolerate
the deficiencies it has identified in the code".
For CEO Carol Bennett, the time has come for the federal regulator to take
control.
"It is beyond time ACMA puts consumers first and treats telco as the essential
service it is by putting an end to the self-regulatory system that has been in
place for too long and harmed too many."
--
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
------------------------------
End of Link Digest, Vol 396, Issue 1
************************************
