Send Link mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Link digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Elon Musk is getting serious about orbital data centers
      (Fernando Cassia)
   2. Re: Elon Musk is getting serious about orbital data centers
      (David)
   3. Credit cards cancelled, Google accounts closed: ICC judges on
      life under Trump sanctions (Kim Holburn)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 22:16:07 -0300
From: Fernando Cassia <[email protected]>
To: Kim Holburn <[email protected]>, Link <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LINK] Elon Musk is getting serious about orbital data
        centers
Message-ID:
        <CACGw4H5c=owonojmgv9ln9edngtjrgaoj6sxhglx-mfgdzd...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026, 7:37?PM Kim Holburn <[email protected]> wrote:

> https://theintercept.com/2026/01/12/data-centers-space-ai/
>
>
> Space is cold and has abundant solar energy ? the very things data centers
> need. Experts tell us it?s not that simple.
>

Exactly. It is cold but has no air.

>From Grok:

How Heat Dissipates in Space

   - Radiation is Sole Method: Without air or matter to transfer heat via
   conduction/convection, objects must emit thermal radiation (infrared light)
   to cool down.
   - Slow Process: Radiative cooling is generally slower than other forms,
   making heat management in space difficult.
   - Spacecraft Engineering: Satellites and the ISS use large radiators to
   artificially manage this, as they cannot rely on air to carry away heat.
   [image: Reddit]Reddit +6


FC

But large questions remain: Is it even possible? And if it is, why bother?
>


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 17:33:15 +1100
From: David <[email protected]>
To: Kim Holburn <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LINK] Elon Musk is getting serious about orbital data
        centers
Message-ID: <1993775.7Z3S40VBb9@ulysses>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Wednesday, 18 February 2026 12:16:07 AEDT Fernando Cassia wrote:
> But large questions remain: Is it even possible? And if it is, why bother?

It would certainly be a tempting target in the event of hostilities too, one 
huge data centre in one go with no casualties, perhaps an "accident" could even 
be arranged in the event of another cold war.  And did anyone mention 
high-energy solar flares or cosmic background radiation?  Or the really basic 
issue of adequate access bandwidth and a reliable network of ground stations?

Suppose such a project gets funding and has to earn a return.  Who would really 
miss it if it sudden;y became unserviceable?  Mankind has only had the Internet 
since yesterday afternoon in the scheme of things, within the lifetime of my 
older grandchildren I think!  Let alone AI...

_DavidL_





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:59:48 +1100
From: Kim Holburn <[email protected]>
To: Link mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: [LINK] Credit cards cancelled, Google accounts closed: ICC
        judges on life under Trump sanctions
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/feb/18/international-criminal-court-icc-judges-trump-sanctions

Credit cards cancelled, Google accounts closed: ICC judges on life under Trump 
sanctions

Kimberly Prost and Luz del Carmen Ib??ez Carranza vow US reprisals will not 
affect work of international criminal court

When the Canadian Kimberly Prost learned Donald Trump?s administration had 
imposed sanctions on her, it came as a shock.

For years, she has sat as a judge at the international criminal court, weighing 
accusations of war crimes, genocide and crimes 
against humanity; now she is on the same list as terrorists and those involved 
in organised crime. ?It really was a moment of a bit 
of disbelief,? she said.

The fallout was both material and psychological. As her credit cards, Amazon 
and Google accounts were cancelled, she reeled from 
what she described as a ?direct and flagrant attack? on one of the world?s most 
prominent courts.

?These are coercive measures designed to attack our ability to do our jobs 
objectively and independently,? she said. ?We want people 
to appreciate how wrong this is.?

Since Trump returned to power last year, his administration has worked steadily 
to hobble the Hague-based court. To date, 11 of the 
court?s officials ? including the chief prosecutor and eight judges ? have been 
placed under sanctions, subjecting them to measures 
that include bans on travel to the US and fines and prison sentences for 
American companies who provide them services.

The executive order led 79 countries ? including Canada, Brazil, Denmark, 
Mexico and Nigeria ? to come together in support of the 
court. The sanctions, they said in a joint letter, ?increase the risk of 
impunity for the most serious crimes and threaten to erode 
the international rule of law?.

Prior to joining the ICC, Prost had spent five years working with the United 
Nations on its sanctions programme. Even so, she was 
surprised at how far-reaching the sanctions were. ?It has such a serious impact 
in terms of day-to-day life, it?s not symbolic,? she 
said. ?You lose all your credit cards, no matter where they were issued.?

Simple tasks, from booking an Uber to reserving a flight or hotel room, became 
impossible. Bank transfers now included uncertainty 
over whether they would sail through the system or be rejected. Following the 
cancellation of her Amazon and Google accounts, Prost 
lived with the constant worry that her other accounts would also vanish. 
?Everything becomes such a challenge,? she said.

For the Peruvian judge Luz del Carmen Ib??ez Carranza, the US sanctions marked 
the second time she had been targeted by a global 
superpower for her work with the ICC. In December, a Russian court had tried 
her in absentia, along with the court?s chief 
prosecutor and seven other judges, following the ICC?s decision to put out an 
arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin over the invasion of 
Ukraine. They were handed sentences of up to 15 years in prison.

But the US sanctions were on another level, given the country?s weight in the 
global financial system. Soon after she was 
sanctioned, Ib??ez Carranza said her bank in the Netherlands cancelled her 
credit card. ?Why? It?s a European bank, not an American 
bank,? she said. ?We?ve seen a kind of over-compliance with the sanctions, 
because some banks are terrified about their relations 
with US banks or institutions.?

What had been most painful, however, was to see how the sanctions had targeted 
her daughter, leading to the cancellation of her US 
visa and Google accounts. ?She lives in another part of the world, she has no 
link to the ICC,? she said. ?It?s sad. This is pure 
retaliation for something she hasn?t done.?

It was a pattern seen across the ICC, she said, where spouses, parents and 
children of officials had ended up caught in the dragnet 
of the sanctions. ?This is the kind of persecution that I think the world 
should not allow to happen,? said Ib??ez Carranza. ?We 
serve humanity. We are delivering justice for the most vulnerable victims 
around the world, for millions and millions of women and 
children who have no voice.?

She pointed to the critical work the court did in taking on cases when nations 
were unable or unwilling to prosecute crimes on their 
territory. ?So my call is for the entire world to defend this institution that 
is the cause of humanity.?

The sanctions have added to an already complicated panorama for the court, 
landing months after its top prosecutor, Karim Khan, was 
accused of sexual misconduct. He has denied the allegations.

While the measures have so far focused on individuals, the court has been 
wrestling with fears that Washington could impose 
sanctions on the court as a whole. ?The concern is the sanctions will be used 
to shut the court down, to destroy it rather than just 
tie its hands,? one ICC official told the Guardian last year.

The court had since sprung into action, said Prost. ?It has been taken very 
seriously and a number of preventative measures are in 
place,? she said.

She and Ib??ez Carranza were resolute that the actions of the Trump 
administration, while challenging on a personal level, had not 
impacted the work of the court. ?These measures are completely futile,? said 
Prost. ?I can say that, on behalf of all of the judges 
of this court and the prosecutors, we will continue to do our jobs 
independently. It does not affect the way we look at our cases or 
how we decide them.?

-- 
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
+61 404072753
mailto:[email protected]  aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


------------------------------

End of Link Digest, Vol 399, Issue 17
*************************************

Reply via email to