Like any number of Apple users I took advantage of the recent free upgrade to 
MacOS X ... Maverick.

Aside from the odd glitch it doesn't seem too bad an OS release. It did take 
about 24 hours after installation to do the necessary file system and other 
maintenance that allowed it to function with the same or better responsivity 
than its Mountain Lion predecessor, it still has the odd glitch when dual 
booting from Windows, and it's an order of magnitude less processor intensive 
than its predecessor (typically averaging 3% CPU usage versus 13-15% for the 
older OS). On the downside, the disk I/O is a little less snappy ... I think 
it's a latency problem caused by the sacrifices they made to get the CPU to 
operate more efficiently - because in sustained large file transfers the 
overheads seem to fall off. All up ... not a bad update.

Well ... except for:

a) Apple made the Cloud mandatory for Maverick. I don't know about you, but I 
have heaps of storage attached to my Mac (10TB) to handle backups, media and 
content, dual boot partitions and the like ... and I've become used to the 
snappy performance and security of locally available programs, files and data 
generally, as well as my privacy and keeping those NSA chappies and other 
spooks out of my life. 

Additionally, iCloud is another Mac/iPad/iPhone lock-in for Apple ... and I've 
come to really dislike hardware lock-ins. (As you may have noticed by my rants 
concerning Apple's proprietary Lightning cables, and the ubiquitous nano-SIM it 
now requires in the iPhones and iPads ... that no other phone or pad on the 
planet uses as far as I know. Neither offer any performance benefit to the user 
... they just lock the user in to Apple)

Finally ... I added in all 10 TB of that local storage, including some wicked 
fast SSD space that has dropped boot times and increased app performance and 
big file handling to stellar levels, so I could get the performance and 
minimise the wait times that doing it over a network necessitates. Similarly I 
maxed out the storage on my iPod, my iPhone and my iPad to I could keep all the 
necessary files, media, songs, movies, books and papers (in PDF format) close 
to me, available at all times, and available quickly ... and the ICloud over 3G 
or even WiFi simply can't compare, and is limited to 5 Gig or so (without 
paying for more) ... which is next to useless in my context.

b) iBooks for the Mac was introduced. Apple now considers it necessary that we 
be able to read ePub files and Adobe PDF's on our computers ... about 10-15 
years after numerous third parties enabled this on Macs. There were any number 
of Mac based competitors capable of reading more e-publishing formats, that are 
more scalable in their ability to handle libraries and files, and that are 
infinitely more reliable and feature filled, that feature better front ends, 
than iBooks for the Mac .... but suddenly it became necessary for iBooks to 
appear on the Mac.

Now normally, that would not be a problem for me. I mean, another alternative 
... who can complain? Right?

The trouble is threefold:

- As part of the introduction of iBooks, Apple retired iTunes as the literary 
(iBooks) content management system for the Mac ... but paradoxically still 
requires users to update their iPad and iPhone iBooks libraries through iTunes. 
The problems at this stage may seem obvious to the average reader, but Apple 
couldn't see that introducing ever more complexity into the process and more 
points of prospective failure could be a problem.

- iBooks for the Mac was supposed to import all the books in the iTunes 
library, and then be used as a reader on the Mac and as the content management 
system for ePubs and PDF's, which iTunes would access when it was doing updates 
of content on iPads and iPhones. The problems are that iBooks for the Mac only 
imported books purchased at the iTunes store, and failed to import hundreds of 
other commercially bought (but DRM free) books, hundreds of other Gutenburg and 
lapsed copyright books, and pretty well all my PDF's (which ranged from 
hundreds of research papers to personally compiled joke collections and the 
like)

How hard would it have been for the developers to say "Ooooh, theres a 
directory called 'Books' in the iTunes library. Let's just import everything in 
that directory when the user first boots iBooks for the Mac, so that the user's 
experience is seamless and problem free and the whole CMS changeover thing is 
transparent to them." Instead, the geniuses inserted file integrity checks (and 
Apple's own ePub format inserts proprietary meta data), half a dozen dialogue 
boxes, and an emphasis on getting the Apple purchases in the library and very 
little else. 

- iTunes then mirrors what's in iBooks for the Mac on your various devices - 
effectively trashing your mobile iBooks library. When you recreate the iTunes 
on the Mac library (by drag copying the iTunes 'Books' directory into the 
iBooks for the Mac Library window - and thereby duplicating the amount of space 
needed to store the books because now they are stored once in iTunes and once 
in iBooks for the Mac) iTunes will update the relevant IOS device with all the 
books in the library .... but, and here's the catch, synchronising thousands of 
books on iCloud will take days, if not weeks, to do ... rendering your iBooks 
library essentially unusable whilst this is happening.

I'm apparently not the only one affected in this debacle ... Apple's iPad, 
iBooks and other user support forums are alive with loud and vociferous 
complaints from a legion of users. So far, Apple has managed to keep a cap on 
it ... and prevented it from escaping into the wider world (and more 
importantly the media) - but unless its fixed 'real soon now' this puppy has 
the potential to become another Maps debacle and seriously damage Apple's much 
vaunted 'ecosphere'.

After the aggravation of the last 10 days, I've had enough. I'm now in the 
process of transferring all my content to third party cross platform open 
standards based clients that don't use DRM, and, if possible, won't wall me in 
to one possible content acquisition channel like Apple has so obviously (and if 
this experience is in any way indicative - ineptly) been trying to make me do. 
I'm also seriously considering acquiring an Android Pad as an alternative to my 
128GB iPad 4 (which Apple's stuff up has rendered much less valuable as a 
reader).

For me, I've drawn some lessons from the experience that others may find 
useful. Others will find them blindingly obvious and have been living by them 
for years (I'm looking at you Craig!) ... but may be amused by the aggravation 
I've gone through (and am still going through as I transfer all my media - 
movies, music, literature etc. across to third party alternatives) before 
coming around to their way of thinking.

The lessons are:
1. Avoid 'walled gardens' - no matter how convenient, ostensibly useful and 
comfortable they are.
2. Always punt for open format DRM free media, documents and content when you 
buy
3. Investigate, try out and use the wealth of commercial third party, OSS and 
other alternatives for consuming literature, music, movies and other media 
across platforms. 
4. Finally, and this is the overarching one ... don't lock yourself into a 
platform, an OS, a supplier or a channel for content. 

Make them compete for your business ...and offer product you want ... don't 
just hand it to them on a fanbois platter. The 'walled garden' simply isn't 
worth it.

Just my 2 cents worth ...
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to