Just a guess, but I'll bet someone just made that up to brush you off. If it were true that copyright would be violated, none of the Commonwealth or State websites would exist. You might contact your state Local Government office or state Planning Department for clarification and issue a complaint.
Jan At 11:13 AM 20/11/2013, David Boxall wrote: >A small incident that Linkers might find interesting. > >A while back, the local council exhibited a development proposal that >has attracted a deal of opposition. When the exhibition period ended, I >found that I could no longer access files associated with the >development application. > >I asked how I could now access the files. The answer I got was that, for >copyright reasons, I could only read paper copies in Council's offices. > >Development Applications are public records. I imagine moral rights >(attribution, etc.) persist. Restricting access or use in any other way >seems a little dodgy to me. > >-- >David Boxall | Drink no longer water, > | but use a little wine >http://david.boxall.id.au | for thy stomach's sake ... > | King James Bible > | 1 Timothy 5:23 >_______________________________________________ >Link mailing list >[email protected] >http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [email protected] Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space. ~Margaret Atwood, writer _ __________________ _ _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
