And the 'Australian Council of Security Professionals' is obviously gonna be 
unbiased, economically disinterested and completely fair and honest about the 
need to exercise their services, and the results that they attain, on a 
client/citizen/state basis cost-benefit analysis, when the annual budget comes 
up?

My major point was, and continues to be, unless these agencies are held 
accountable and responsible for their actions ... preferably by outside parties 
interested in seeing the taxpayer/state gets value for money, and continue to 
enjoy the rights and privileges guaranteed by law and convention then we have 
advanced nowhere, then we have lost the plot. Agencies will continue to put 
forward increased budget estimates (and BTW, love the $600 million added to the 
last one to handle design deficiencies in the original building they wanted in 
our capital that nobody was held accountable for leaking), huge intelligence 
infrastructure increases and continue creating even more outstanding debacles 
like this, and consistent failures to predict.

And yes, I know intelligence agencies are between a rock and a hard place. And 
yes, I know that a parliamentary Committee and the Attorney General oversee 
them in secret. But I have seen no evidence that ANY of this oversight has 
resulted in any improvement of performance, any efficiencies, any increase in 
effectiveness or any lessening in the number and severity of the regular 
debacles which they oversee or cause. 

And given that most/all of the oversight appears functionally ineffective ... 
perhaps its time for the agencies to make their various empire building cases 
in a more public forum - like all other federal agencies have to do.

>From the North Korean invasion over the 39th Parallel, through central Europe 
>in the Cold War, through Burgess, Maclean and Co, and through the Bay of Pigs, 
>Indonesia and Sukarno, Malaysia in the early 60's, Vietnam after France pulled 
>out, Chile, South America, Timor, religious fundamentalism in the 90's and 
>Noughties, through Wikipedia, Manning and Snowden ... they missed it and/or 
>interpreted what they saw badly ... and all resulted in diabolical messes 
>despite (and in many cases, because of) our intelligence agencies. There are a 
>heap of other examples if you want me to elucidate.

And now they take my privacy, my independence, they seek to institute ever more 
draconian controls on my behaviour and (like their private industry 
counterparts) suck up data concerning my behaviour, thinking and motivations.

I'm finding the cost is too damn high ... I'm doing a cost-benefit analysis if 
you like ... especially given what I see as the prospective risks - and I think 
the intelligence fraternity would be real smart to 'lie low' for a few years 
rather than continuing their push for more resources to invade of their 
citizen's private space using ever increasing amounts of the taxpayer dollar.

Just my 2 cents worth ...
---
On 21 Nov 2013, at 3:00 pm, Tom Worthington <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 21/11/13 13:05, Frank O'Connor wrote:
> 
>> I find it interesting that nobody... seems to be asking ...
> 
> It happens I am at the Australasian Council of Security Professionals 
> Seminar at the ANU in Canberra today. The delegates spend their working 
> days asking what information should, and can, be collected, analyzed and 
> how far to disseminate the results. But they tend not to discuss  any of 
> this in public forums: 
> http://blog.tomw.net.au/2013/11/australian-national-resilience-cyber.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tom Worthington FACS CP, TomW Communications Pty Ltd. t: 0419496150
> The Higher Education Whisperer http://blog.highereducationwhisperer.com/
> PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617, Australia  http://www.tomw.net.au
> Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards
> Legislation
> 
> Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science,
> Australian National University http://cs.anu.edu.au/courses/COMP7310/
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to