On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 09:16 +1100, Kim Holburn wrote:
> http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/529392/20131211/gchq-forced-privatesky-secure-email-service-offline.htm
> > "We are business people but we believe in privacy, internet freedom and 
> > responsible government."

The reason they had to give up, and the reason they were a viable target
in the first place, was that they centralised control in a single
entity. If there were a distributed mechanism in place (think Tor),
these problems would go away.

I don't know what that mechanism is - but it's the answer :-)

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer ([email protected])
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389

GPG fingerprint: B862 FB15 FE96 4961 BC62 1A40 6239 1208 9865 5F9A
Old fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to