Not really related to Stephen's comment, but for another take on this puppy:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/30/google_glass_car_ban_bills/ Just someone else's 2 cents worth ... :) --- On 31 Jan 2014, at 2:41 am, [email protected] wrote: > Frank and Janet write, > >> At any rate ... I still think the issues need to be addressed. >> >>> In a world of guilt by statistical correlation actual personal video >>> might be handy? All these things depend on which end of the telescope >>> dataset or camera you're at. photographer, data owner, subscriber ... > > > Would agree with both. Google Glasses raise both problems, and solutions. > > For an example, according to today's Deloitte Global Technology Media and > Telecommunications predictions report .. “There are many opportunities for > applying wearables to improve safety and efficiency, by providing quicker > and safer access to data.” Johnston also said, “a recent trial of Google > Glass by police in US towns resulted in an 80 percent drop in accusations > of police brutality, and a drop in cases of excessive use of force by > police.” > > Personally, I can see a good case for all public servants being required > to wear them whilst on duty, and interacting with the public. And with a > copy of all recordings of the interactions readily available to citizens. > > Cheers, > Stephen > > Ref: > http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/537096/phablets_wearables_hit_prime_time_2 > 014_deloitte/ > > > > Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server > > > > _______________________________________________ > Link mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
