https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140609/07284327524/no-computer-did-not-pass-turing-test-first-time-everyone-should-know-better.shtml

> No, A 'Supercomputer' Did NOT Pass The Turing Test For The First Time And 
> Everyone Should Know Better
> 
> from the what-a-waste-of-time dept
> 
> So, this weekend's news in the tech world was flooded with a "story" about 
> how a "chatbot" passed the Turing Test for "the first time," with lots of 
> publications buying every point in the story and talking about what a big 
> deal it was. Except, almost everything about the story is bogus and a bunch 
> of gullible reporters ran with it, because that's what they do. First, here's 
> the press release from the University of Reading, which should have set off 
> all sorts of alarm bells for any reporter. Here are some quotes, almost all 
> of which are misleading or bogus:

> Okay, almost everything about the story is bogus. Let's dig in:
>       • It's not a "supercomputer," it's a chatbot. It's a script made to 
> mimic human conversation. There is no intelligence, artificial or not 
> involved. It's just a chatbot.
>       • Plenty of other chatbots have similarly claimed to have "passed" the 
> Turing test in the past (often with higher ratings). Here's a story from 
> three years ago about another bot, Cleverbot, "passing" the Turing Test by 
> convincing 59% of judges it was human (much higher than the 33% Eugene 
> Goostman) claims.
>       • It "beat" the Turing test here by "gaming" the rules -- by telling 
> people the computer was a 13-year-old boy from Ukraine in order to mentally 
> explain away odd responses.
>       • The "rules" of the Turing test always seem to change. Hell, Turing's 
> original test was quite different anyway.
>       • As Chris Dixon points out, you don't get to run a single test with 
> judges that you picked and declare you accomplished something. That's just 
> not how it's done. If someone claimed to have created nuclear fusion or cured 
> cancer, you'd wait for some peer review and repeat tests under other 
> circumstances before buying it, right?
>       • The whole concept of the Turing Test itself is kind of a joke. While 
> it's fun to think about, creating a chatbot that can fool humans is not 
> really the same thing as creating artificial intelligence. Many in the AI 
> world look on the Turing Test as a needless distraction.


> Oh, and the biggest red flag of all. The event was organized by Kevin Warwick 
> at Reading University. If you've spent any time at all in the tech world, you 
> should automatically have red flags raised around that name. Warwick is 
> somewhat infamous for his ridiculous claims to the press, which gullible 
> reporters repeat without question. He's been doing it for decades. All the 
> way back in 2000, we were writing about all the ridiculous press he got for 
> claiming to be the world's first "cyborg" for implanting a chip in his arm. 
> There was even a -- since taken down -- Kevin Warwick Watch website that 
> mocked and categorized all of his media appearances in which gullible 
> reporters simply repeated all of his nutty claims. Warwick had gone quiet for 
> a while, but back in 2010, we wrote about how his lab was getting bogus press 
> for claiming to have "the first human infected with a computer virus." The 
> Register has rightly referred to Warwick as both "Captain Cyborg" and a 
> "media strumpet" and has long been chronicling his escapades in exaggerating 
> bogus stories about the intersection of humans and computers for many, many 
> years. 
> 
> Basically, any reporter should view extraordinary claims associated with 
> Warwick with extreme caution. But that's not what happened at all. Instead, 
> as is all too typical with Warwick claims, the press went nutty over it, 
> including publications that should know better. Here are just a few sample 
> headlines. The absolute worst are the ones who claim this is a 
> "supercomputer."

Obligatory xkcd:

http://xkcd.com/329/

-- 
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
T: +61 2 61402408  M: +61 404072753
mailto:[email protected]  aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request 




_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to