On 12/07/14 19:40, Jan Whitaker wrote: > It's finally dawned on someone and they have yet to solve it. Nine > months. ZERO connections to FTTN. ...
Perhaps the NBN Nodes could be solar powered, or by light sent down the fibre? ;-) More seriously, power was not an issue for the Transact FTTN system in Canberra. The data cables were mostly run along power poles, by the local power company and so power was readily available. The Transact node in the basement of my apartment block is located in a telecommunications closet designed into the building, with power supplied by the building (I assume the body corporate is paying for the power): http://www.tomw.net.au/links/20020501.html On 12/07/14 21:05, Frank O'Connor wrote: > ... issues that haven't even been looked at with respect to those > pesky nodes ... maintenance ... traffic/disaster ... The Transact Nodes appear to have worked reliably for ten years. Part of the network was destroyed in the 2003 Canberra fire storm. Some nodes lost mains power and their battery backup ran out after 12 hours, but the main problem was that the overhead cable was vulnerable to fire. The rest of the network continued to operate (the Internet connection to my apartment kept working): http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2003-January/047598.html -- Tom Worthington FACS CP, TomW Communications Pty Ltd. t: 0419496150 The Higher Education Whisperer http://blog.highereducationwhisperer.com/ PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617, Australia http://www.tomw.net.au Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science, Australian National University http://cs.anu.edu.au/courses/COMP7310/ _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
