On 20/11/2015 2:42 PM, Jan Whitaker wrote: > http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/first-test-of-antipiracy-websiteblocking-laws-targets-small-isp-20151119-gl3l5f.html > > The AG (one thinks it must involve them?) can't be serious if this is their > test case. > If they don't understand the difference between trademark, patent and > copyright law, we are in deep trouble. Jan - the AGD is not involved in this one. Its a private matter, with these provisions being obliquely referred to in a letter from a law firm representing a private Australian company. The lawyers appear to think they can cite this law to block a website using an Australian firm's logo without permission. No government involvement - I'm hoping this private Australian company aren't paying a great deal for their legal advisors. Nothing to see here.
_______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
