[More over-reaction in the laura norder State.

[And, if the reporting is correct, mens rea has been dispensed with, i.e. 
possession is sufficient, and lack of intention, and even lack of knowledge of 
existence of the file, may not be a defence. 

[But stay relaxed, because of course law enforcement agencies would never 
utilise an excessive law, now would they.]


NSW citizens face jail for possessing files for 3D-printed guns
Allie Coyne
itNews
Nov 23, 2015 10:34AM
http://www.itnews.com.au/news/nsw-citizens-face-jail-for-possessing-files-for-3d-printed-guns-412133
 
Up to 14 years in prison.

NSW citizens who are found to possess digital files for the printing of 3D guns 
face up to 14 years' jail under new laws just passed by the state government.

Last week the state parliament approved the Firearms and Weapons Prohibition 
Legislation Amendment Bill 2015.

Among other things, the bill amends the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 to make 
possessing "digital blueprints for the manufacture of prohibited weapons on 3D 
printers or electronic milling machines" an offence.

The maximum penalty for the offence in 14 years prison, even if the computer 
containing the files is located outside of NSW.

The legislation adds to existing laws prohibiting owning or using a 3D-printed 
gun.

It marks the first time an Australian government has passed legislation to 
prevent the spread of 3D-printed weapons.

In May this year the Queensland Labor government decided not to proceed with 
legisation to regulate and penalise the manufacture of 3D-printed guns.

The previous parliament had considered amendments to the state's Weapons Act to 
impose conditions of practice and penalties for non-compliance and make the 
creation and possession of printed weapons an offence.

The federal government also started looking into the issue last year, with a 
senate inquiry tasked with studying how to reduce gun-related violence, 
especially with the advent of firearms made with 3D printers.

It ultimately recommended that Australian governments look at implementing 
uniform regulations for the manufacture of 3D-printed weapons across all 
jurisdictions, and continue to monitor the risks associated with the devices 
and consider further regulations if required.

In 2013, NSW Police revealed it was using the blueprints for the world's first 
3D printable gun, dubbed The Liberator and owned by US firm Defence 
Distributed, to test a 3D printed gun.

It bought a $1700 desktop 3D printer and $35 of materials to create the 3D gun, 
which managed to fire but destroyed itself in the process.

[You'd have thought that the fact it blew up in their faces might have got them 
worried about the same thing happening, metaphorically of course, with badly 
specified legislation.]


-- 
Roger Clarke                                 http://www.rogerclarke.com/
                                     
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd      78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61 2 6288 6916                        http://about.me/roger.clarke
mailto:[email protected]                http://www.xamax.com.au/ 

Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law            University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science    Australian National University
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to