On 14/02/2016 8:55 AM, Chris Johnson wrote: > If we were able to choose between a robotic medical care system with 95% > correctness (based on its past history) and a human system with 90% > (likewise), what rational person would not choose the robotic? > Anjali Jaiprakash, Jonathan Roberts, Ross Crawford in The Conversation > wrote: >> Most rational people would opt for the course of action that is more >> likely to save their child.
When you add: "If things go wrong (i.e. outside normal parameters/reactions, including standard variations) there is a 5% chance the robotic system could cope and an 80% chance a human system could cope" which would you choose? -- Regards brd Bernard Robertson-Dunn Sydney Australia email: [email protected] web: www.drbrd.com web: www.problemsfirst.com Blog: www.problemsfirst.com/blog _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
