Hi all,
Optical networking was never my field, but something about this doesn't
feel quite right. Can any Linker comment?
<https://www.facebook.com/nbndefender/photos/a.443327165782151.1073741828.441143292667205/987924517989077/?type=3&comment_id=989627697818759&reply_comment_id=989798751134987>
Its about costs, if houses are too far apart, there will be too much
loss on the fibre to be splitting to every house to meet the current
contention ratios, this would mean that extra fibre will have to be
used to service these types of customers. ... Wireless is not a bad
solution, it is fixed, with antennas(so different to mobile) and can
service areas where population is more sprawled than in town centres.
Fibre has a 50% loss on every split(its a shared fibre to around 22
homes) so it becomes less viable and cost effective the further
residences get apart.
--
David Boxall | A fool is certain;
| an ignorant fool,
http://david.boxall.id.au | absolutely so.
--Graffito
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
