So Morrison orders an inquiry. The Productivity Commission duly provides
the findings that he wanted. Seems neither of them consulted nbn™.
I hate to think how many lives have been lost because of the
privatisation of our telecommunications infrastructure and Telstra's
subsequent neglect. I don't want to find out how many more will be lost
if our government further evades its responsibilities to ensure
equitable access to telecommunications services. The USO proposal is
just that: an attempt to relieve our government of responsibility.
I agree with Optus that: “There is little justification for maintaining
the legacy Telstra copper network ...". That would be idiotic. Replacing
the old copper with optical fibre, on the other hand, would be both
responsible and rational.
<http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/nbn-co-bristles-at-possible-uso-costshifting/news-story/cfccf167086403a2c271ea054172efba>
The Australian
12:00AM February 27, 2017
ANNABEL HEPWORTH
National Business correspondentSydney
@HepworthAnnabel
The company rolling out the National Broadband Network is warning that
proposals to overhaul the scheme that compensates Telstra to the tune
of billions of dollars for providing basic phone services to the bush
could add to the costs of Australia’s biggest infrastructure project.
The NBN Co says the Productivity Commission’s draft plan for phasing
out the existing universal service obligation regime could drive more
costs on to the NBN and add to the losses the NBN already faces in
providing super-fast broadband services in regional and rural Australia.
In a new submission, the NBN Co says that any USO changes pushing it
to provide voice services to all areas in Australia “could have
material cost and timing implications for NBN’s deployment”.
The warning underscores the extreme political sensitivity around the
NBN, which last year had to secure a $19.5 billion government loan to
finish the rollout and will cost up to $54bn to build.
It is set to reignite the dispute between Telstra — which receives
about $300 million yearly in funding to ensure everybody in the
country can access a standard phone service and payphone — and its
rivals, who have long condemned the USO as outdated.
The development comes as the NBN Co will today upgrade its website so
that households and businesses will be able to find out whether they
would get the “Rolls-Royce” fibre-to-the-premises network advocated by
Labor or other technologies in the Coalition’s NBN model. Previously,
the NBN Co had removed this, meaning people in the fixed-line
footprint could not find out what technology they would get.
Last year, a Productivity Commission inquiry ordered by Scott Morrison
said the USO was “outdated”, “anachronistic” and “needs to change”.
In a draft report, the commission recommended the existing USO be
phased out, arguing that it would be made obsolete by a completed NBN
that provided broadband and voice services to all Australians.
But the NBN Co argues that its network was not engineered to provide a
universal voice service.
The network “has not been established to provide voice services to all
locations, and changes to USO policy that resulted in NBN being
expected to do so would increase the time and cost involved in NBN’s
deployment”, the submission says. “It cannot be assumed that it is a
costless or trivial exercise for NBN to take on activities which are
currently the responsibility of other parties.”
The threat that greater investment could be needed is significant as
the government faces pressure to avoid undermining the financial
returns for the NBN; if the rate of return falls too low, the
government would be forced to treat the project as a direct expense
and this would add to the budget deficit.
The NBN Co designed its fixed-line networks — which will go to 10.9
million premises by the end of the rollout — to support legacy voice
services.
But this was not the case for the fixed wireless and satellite
services — which provide high-speed internet to the bush and urban
fringes — because government policy has been for Telstra to provide
USO voice services outside the fixed-line footprint.
If Telstra’s contractual obligations for the USO are wound back, “the
likely effect would be the migration of services from Telstra’s
networks, leading to an increase in demand for NBN’s fixed wireless
and satellite services, driving more costs on to the NBN”, the
submission says.
For instance, the NBN could need to invest in extra radio network
equipment and base stations and install more antennas in remote
locations. Any costs would have to be “acknowledged and explicitly
funded”, the submission says.
Instead, the NBN says mobile networks could be used more. The NBN
“believes a greater focus is required in the supply of universal voice
services for those outside the NBN network’s fixed-line footprint”, a
spokesman for the company said yesterday.
The NBN argues this would allow the USO to start being wound back in
areas with mobile coverage. The submission points to estimates by the
Bureau of Communications Research that NBN faces net losses of $9.8bn
in net present value terms in providing broadband services over the
fixed wireless and satellite networks.
“This is at the heart of NBN’s concerns with proposals that result in
these networks being required to supply additional services,” the
submission says.
In its draft report, the commission argued that NBN infrastructure
would deliver a “high quality” voice service over fixed-line and
fixed-wireless, but said there was a question about the adequacy of
the service in pockets of the satellite footprint.
Optus has told the commission that it was a “regrettable policy
misstep” that the USO was retained when reforms associated with the
NBN were developed.
“There is little justification for maintaining the legacy Telstra
copper network as the NBN is rolled out since customers are guaranteed
access to both voice and data services over the NBN; in addition, they
will also have access to high-quality voice and data services from
mobile operators,” Optus has told the commission.
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link