Request to the Link Institute:

I've tried to summarise in 2 pages what the mechanisms are whereby the Internet 
industry rapes and pillages personal data.  See here:

                  The Digital Surveillance Economy
            http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/InDigR.html#DSE

Feedback on errors and omissions much appreciated!

Be warned:  the paper as a whole is academic and turgid (but of course comments 
on any and all aspects would be helpful).

Thanks!  ...  Roger


          Risks Inherent in the Digital Surveillance Economy:  
                         A Research Agenda
               http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/InDigR.html

The digitisation of a considerable amount of information about the world 
relevant to business has given rise to a new phase of 'digitalisation'.  This 
involves a substantial shift in business models and industrial organisation, 
such that the interpretation and management of the world through human 
perception and cognition has been to a considerable extent replaced by 
processes that are almost entirely dependent on digital data.  Some 
applications of digitalisation, in addition to creating opportunities, give 
rise to threats to individuals, and risks to people, society and polity.

A review of the notions of information society, surveillance society, the 
surveillance state, and surveillance capitalism provides a basis for 
appreciating the nature of what is referred to here as 'the digital 
surveillance economy' - a new form of business model that was initiated by 
Google at the beginning of the 21st century.  This model is predicated on the 
acquisition, expropriation and consolidation of very large volumes of personal 
data, and its exploitation in order to target advertisements, manipulate 
consumer behaviour, and price goods and services at the highest level that each 
individual is willing to bear.  In the digital surveillance economy, not only 
is the consumer converted from the customer to the product, but consumers' 
interests have almost no impact on the process, and are ignored.  In the words 
of the model's architects, users are 'bribed' and 'induced' to make their data 
available at minimal cost to marketers.

The processes of digitisation of the individual, followed by the digitalisation 
of business processes, has given rise to a digital surveillance economy.  This 
harbours great threats to the interests of individuals, and to the relationship 
between corporations, on the one hand, and society and polity on the other.  
The new economic wave may prove to be a tsunami that swamps the social 
dimension and washes away the last five centuries' individualism and humanism.  
Alternatively, institutions may achieve regulatory adaptation in order to 
overcome the worst of the negative impacts;  or a breaking-point could be 
reached and consumers might rebel against corporate domination.  A research 
framework is suggested, within which the alternative scenarios can be 
investigated. 


-- 
Roger Clarke                                 http://www.rogerclarke.com/
                                     
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd      78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61 2 6288 6916                        http://about.me/roger.clarke
mailto:[email protected]                http://www.xamax.com.au/ 

Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law            University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science    Australian National University
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to