On 29/05/2017 10:04 AM, Stephen Loosley wrote:
...
An attractive proposition?
No.
...
"Britain's on the brink of a small-scale nuclear reactor revolution"
...
Geez, I hope not.
There's much to be learned from research into nuclear energy. For that
reason alone, research should continue. Nuclear power, on the other
hand, has failed. It's proved far too costly (and not only in dollar
terms). Much as the industry likes to deny that nuclear power generation
has never harmed anyone, we'll probably never know the full toll of
ill-health and death.
Meanwhile, the planet is awash with energy. We have but to harvest what
we need. With the speed of development in renewables and storage, if we
began building a conventional nuclear power reactor today, it would
probably be obsolete before it came online (not to mention, if it ran
true to form, many years late and many times over budget).
There are very good reasons why neither the finance industry nor the
insurance industry will support nuclear power. The verdict of the market
is clear; nuclear power is dead. Let the poor thing rest in peace.
--
David Boxall | My figures are just as good
| as any other figures.
http://david.boxall.id.au | I make them up myself, and they
| always give me innocent pleasure.
| --HL Mencken
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
