Perhaps ironic ..

> The Australian Department of Defence has finally ditched Microsoft’s long 
> out-of-support
> Windows XP operating system, making the jump to Windows 10. The veteran 
> Windows XP
> user announced the completed migration of its 100,000 personnel across 
> Australia to the
> replacement operating system on Friday.. It had continued to pay for Windows 
> XP support
> until June 2019 after it signed a $2.8 million deal with Microsoft in July 
> 2017.


'We Refuse to Create Technology for Warfare and Oppression':

Microsoft Workers Demand Company End  (U.S.) Army Contract

"As employees and shareholders we do not want to become war profiteers."

Andrea Germanos, Published on Saturday, February 23, 2019 By Common Dreams
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/02/23/we-refuse-create-technology-warfare-and-oppression-microsoft-workers-demand-company


Declaring to chief executives that they refuse "to become war profiteers," a 
group of Microsoft workers on Friday demanded the company cancel a contract 
with the U.S. Army that they say would "help people kill" and turn warfare into 
a "video game."

Their open letter is addressed to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and president and 
chief legal officer Brad Smith, and, according to the "Microsoft Workers 4 
Good" Twitter handle, which posted the document, it got over employee 100 
signatures in its first day.

      On behalf of workers at Microsoft, we're releasing an open letter to Brad 
Smith and Satya Nadella,
      demanding for the cancellation of the IVAS contract with a call for 
stricter ethical guidelines. If you're
      a Microsoft employee you can sign at: https://t.co/958AhvIHO5 
pic.twitter.com/uUZ5P4FJ7X
    — Microsoft Workers 4 Good (@MsWorkers4) February 22, 2019

At issue is Microsoft's $479 million contract to supply the military's 
Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) program with augmented reality 
headsets. It's for a platform that the government says is intended to "increase 
lethality by enhancing the ability to detect, decide, and engage before the 
enemy."

Microsoft would use it HoloLens technology for the contract.

Taking this step, however, would be something Microsoft has never before done: 
"cross[ing] the line into weapons development," the workers write.

"It will be deployed on the battlefield, and works by turning warfare into a 
simulated 'video game,' further distancing soldiers from the grim stakes of war 
and the reality of bloodshed," the letter states. "Intent to harm is not an 
acceptable use of our technology."

Smith's suggestion that workers who find a project "unethical" find a different 
project to work on is problematic, the workers explain:

    There are many engineers who contributed to HoloLens before this contract 
even existed, believing it would be used to help architects and engineers build 
buildings and cars, to help teach people how to perform surgery or play the 
piano, to push the boundaries of gaming, and to connect with the Mars Rover 
(RIP). These engineers have now lost their ability to make decisions about what 
they work on, instead finding themselves implicated as war profiteers.

    [...]

    Microsoft's mission is to empower every person and organization on the 
planet to do more. But implicit in that statement, we believe it is also 
Microsoft's mission to empower every person and organization on the planet to 
do good. We also need to be mindful of who we're empowering and what we're 
empowering them to do. Extending this core mission to encompass warfare and 
disempower Microsoft employees, is disingenuous, as "every person" also means 
empowering us. As employees and shareholders we do not want to become war 
profiteers. To that end, we believe that Microsoft must stop in its activities 
to empower the U.S. Army's ability to cause harm and violence.

In addition to ending the IVAS contract, the workers demand that Microsoft:

    Cease developing any and all weapons technologies, and draft a 
public-facing acceptable use policy clarifying this commitment;   and
    Appoint an independent, external ethics review board with the power to 
enforce and publicly validate compliance with its acceptable use policy.

Microsoft, for its part, confirmed on Friday its committment to helping the 
military.

Technology giant Google faced similar criticism from workers last year for its 
work on drone and artificial intelligence (AI) technology with the U.S. 
military. Following the outcry, Google announced it would not renew its 
contract on the Pentagon program known as Project Maven.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 
License
--

Cheers,
Stephen

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to