I've put a proposal to Computer Law & Security Review for a series of
three articles on 'Responsible AI'.
It's all drafted, and I need to submit it in about a week's time.
I'd very much appreciate the thoughts of people in the link community.
The biggest payback for me is of course the detection of outright
errors, seriously misleading expressions, missed opportunities, and
passages that are incomprehensible.
But any observations at all of the 'constructively negative' variety can
be very helpful.
0. Series Overview (1 x A4 page):
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIA.html
1. Why the World Wants Controls over Artificial Intelligence
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AII.html
2. Principles and Business Processes for Responsible AI
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIP.html
3. Regulatory Alternatives for AI
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIR.html
The articles can be read in sequence. But it's intended that key
elements should make reasonable sense if read in a standalone manner, in
particular these bits:
- The Threats Inherent in AI
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AII.html#Th
- Stakeholder and Multi-Stakeholder Risk Assessment and Management
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIP.html#SRA
- Principles for Responsible AI
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIP.html#TP
The 10 Abstract Principles
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIP.html#T4
The 50 Detailed Principles
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIP.html#App1
- A Co-Regulatory Framework for AI
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AIR.html#CRF
Many thanks! ... Roger
Roger Clarke mailto:[email protected]
T: +61 2 6288 6916 http://www.xamax.com.au http://www.rogerclarke.com
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science Australian National University
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
