https://theqlder.com/2019/05/11/how-the-liberals-sabotaged-the-nbn/

> James Calligeros 
> 
> Spurred on by two decades of Telstra owning a private monopoly on last-mile 
> telecommunications infrastructure, the Labor Party envisioned the NBN as the 
> solution to Australia’s growing digital divide. In 2013, the solution became 
> part of the problem with the Liberal Party’s total destruction of the 
> program. Why?
> 
> No two entities stood to lose more from the NBN than Rupert Murdoch’s News 
> Corporation and Telstra. One controlled – and still controls – virtually all 
> regularly circulated print media in Australia. The other controlled a 
> vertically integrated telecommunications monopoly for well over a decade. 
> Together they controlled the only pay TV network in the country – Foxtel.
> 
> The NBN posed an existential threat to this triad. It would take away 
> Telstra’s vertically integrated monopoly on telecommunications. Access to 
> streaming services would severely disrupt Foxtel’s monopoly on “premium” 
> entertainment. Ubiquitous access to real news would deprive News Corporation 
> of its ability to control the country’s political narrative. For Telstra, 
> News Corp and Foxtel to remain viable, Rupert Murdoch would have to destroy 
> the NBN.
> 
> To this end, he relied on an ally in government. A man with no mind, with no 
> ideas of his own. One might almost say a man with no brain. No, not Baldrick. 
> Tony Abbott. The plan was to destroy the NBN from within, and hopefully make 
> a few bucks while doing so.
> 
> The 2013 Liberal broadband policy launch was a farce. Abbott’s script was 
> blatantly prepared directly by his puppet masters, as it amounted to little 
> more than a regurgitation of the same hogwash that had been appearing in the 
> pages of Murdoch’s The Australian. He repeated lie after lie after lie. 
> Labor’s plan is going to cost $90bn (the FTTP cost per premises almost halved 
> from 2011 to 2013). Labor’s plan was not going to be finished until 2030 
> (FTTP rollout time for a given service area was shortened by weeks between 
> 2011 and 2013). Labor’s plan was extravagant and unnecessary. The Liberal 
> Party was taking with it to the election an alternative NBN (in the same way 
> that anti-vax pages are “alternative news”). The Liberal party proposed an 
> alternative they promised would be “cheaper, faster, sooner.” Spoiler alert – 
> it wasn’t any of those.
> 
> Abbott continued to belabour the point that the Internet was nothing more 
> than a “…video entertainment network…” used by entitled millennials to pirate 
> Game of Thrones, and that no one actually needed what Labor was building. 
> Abbott also mentioned that Telstra’s 5G network would render FTTP obsolete (a 
> moronic statement that will never come to fruition), so we should all just go 
> contract with Telstra! And just as a final extra middle finger to the art of 
> subtlety, this entire event was hosted at Foxtel Studios in Sydney.
> 
> The new Liberal policy was to stop roll outs of a permanently future proof, 
> world-class network and replace it with a technology from the late 90s that 
> Telstra itself said was dead in the water in 2003; Fibre to the Node. Rather 
> than roll fibre all the way to the premises, it would be deployed to a 
> roadside cabinet, from which Telstra’s existing copper network would be used 
> to provide VDSL to the premises. This is the same Telstra copper network that 
> in 2003 was described by Telstra CEO Ziggy Switkowski as being “…five minutes 
> to midnight…” The Liberal party promised that FTTN would be capable of 
> delivering a minimum of 25Mbps to all Australians by 2016, a promise they 
> knew they could not keep, and had no intention of doing so anyway.
> 
> Perhaps the biggest slap in the face to the Australian people is that by 
> 2013, most newer developments already had a variant of FTTN called RIM. This 
> service began seeing widespread deployment by Telstra in the late 90s as a 
> cheaper alternative to running copper all the way from the exchange. The real 
> motive was to lock entire estates into only being with Telstra for telephony 
> and broadband services, as third parties were unable to access this RIM 
> infrastructure. The service was (and is) unreliable and slow, to the point 
> where people stuck on RIMs often request to be moved to a direct connection 
> to the exchange. And this is the technology the Liberal Party said would 
> bring Australians into the 21st century.
> 
> The Abbott Government’s first act was to force the resignation of NBNCo. 
> chairman Dr Mike Quigley – a man who had for years been extremely critical of 
> Telstra’s market practices. After doing away with Dr Quigley, one Dr Ziggy 
> Switkowski was appointed as chairman. Yes, him. It seems like “five minutes 
> to midnight” actually means “forever if you shovel enough money into it.”
> 
> Following Switkowski’s appointment, all NBNCo. operations were ordered to 
> cease pending a “Strategic Review” into the feasibility of the network. This 
> review was principally conducted by Deloitte – the same Deloitte responsible 
> for the 2011 tobacco lobby’s report into the Australian tobacco industry – a 
> report universally condemned and called “baseless and deceptive” by Home 
> Affairs Minister Brendan O’Connor. This review halted all operations at 
> NBNCo. for at least 3 months.
> 
> Oddly enough, this totally independent and unbiased report concluded that 
> FTTP was in fact the work of Satan. The report also “recommended” following 
> the Liberal Party NBN policy document to the tee. Build and design contracts 
> for FTTP were torn up on the spot, leaving suburbs such as Ascot literally 
> half-baked. Palm Avenue, for example, has FTTP deployed halfway down the 
> street, while the other half is still yet to be connected to the NBN.
> 
> Half a year was then wasted redesigning the network and drawing up new 
> contracts with Telstra to shovel as much money as possible into the 
> corporation. Telstra won design, build and maintenance contracts for the 
> copper component of the network. It is important to bear in mind through all 
> of this an ex-Telstra CEO was chairman of NBNCo – a chairman who had in the 
> past been found in breach of conflict of interest laws as head of ANSTO, 
> Australia’s nuclear regulator.
> 
> Most of 2014 was now gone, and no new work had been done on the NBN save for 
> some limited FTTN trials. Towards the end of 2014 however, large-scale 
> deployment of FTTN began, and this is where NBN complaints started flooding 
> the mainstream media. Of course, these complaints mostly came from 
> ill-informed people who blamed Labor for “doing the NBN,” as was the 
> intention of the Liberal Party from the start – turn public opinion against 
> the NBN.
> 
> The Party now had a dilemma. The public was no longer accepting FTTN as a 
> solution, but after years of badgering Labor for FTTP, they could not turn 
> back. This is where the “anything but fibre” doctrine was adopted. NBNCo. 
> moved to minimise the amount of FTTN in the network by approaching Optus and 
> Telstra with offers to buy their HFC networks. Optus received $800m. Telstra, 
> on the other hand, received an IV drip. The transfer of HFC assets was 
> incorporated into the existing $11bn “pit and pipe” lease contract, the 
> details of which remained private for a while. Telstra guaranteed the 
> government this network was fit for use. More spoilers – it wasn’t.
> 
> HFC as a technology is infinitely superior to FTTN and almost as good as FTTP 
> … when designed and built properly. Optus’s network was designed and built 
> first and foremost as a broadband network. Telstra’s was designed originally 
> only to carry Foxtel. Again, in totally transparent and unbiased trials, 
> Optus’s network was deemed unfit for purpose and discarded. $800m of your 
> money gone. Telstra’s network was of course perfect.
> 
> Telstra’s network was designed for a maximum utilisation of around 30% of the 
> rollout area. This information was either withheld from the government or 
> ignored by a certain ex-Telstra CEO. NBNCo thought it had a huge win on its 
> hands – a “here’s one I prepared earlier” network that they could just start 
> connecting customers to immediately. Except when they started doing so, the 
> network failed. NBN, Telstra Cable and Foxtel services all suffered from 
> widespread disruptions and signal quality issues. Years of neglect and 
> absolute barebones maintenance had left it in a state of disrepair. Loose 
> connections, corroded taps, 20+ year old amps, cables chewed up by rats. Last 
> year, NBNCo. made the decision to halt all new connections to HFC and spend 
> some time remediating the network. No points for guessing which large telco 
> with HFC experience was awarded this multi-billion-dollar remediation 
> contract.
> 
> Again, in a total oversight and not at all a conscious decision borne of deep 
> rooted corruption, Telstra and Foxtel were allowed to continue connecting new 
> customers as NBNCo paid to expand and repair the network. Telstra also used 
> the refurbished network to boost speeds on Telstra Cable at no cost to 
> themselves which resulted in a large number of new customers signing 24-month 
> contracts for the service – contracts which also locked them in to staying 
> with Telstra when NBNCo eventually lifted the stop-sell.
> 
> Unlocking HFC’s full speeds requires the entire RF spectrum from 60-1000MHz 
> be available to NBNCo. Part of the purchase agreement made with Telstra is 
> that Foxtel gets to stay on the network – our network – for as long as they 
> like – consuming the vast majority of the RF spectrum on the network.
> 
> We were sold universal access to high-speed broadband, and a dream of 
> unlocking new economic prosperity, a dream we were so close to realising. 
> What we got instead was literal state-sponsored Bolt Report broadcasts, 
> delivered straight to your Foxtel telescreen on government-owned 
> infrastructure. What we got is outer metropolitan suburbs on satellite 
> connections meant to be reserved for remote homesteads. What we got was a 
> hodgepodge of old Telstra assets that were on the table for replacement 15 
> years ago. What we got was brazen and deep-rooted corruption – the pissing 
> away of Australia’s digital future – and the giving away of undisclosed 
> billions of taxpayer dollars – in exchange for positive coverage in the 
> Murdoch press and a free ride to the PM’s office.
> 
> This is on everyone that voted Liberal in 2013. This is on everyone who 
> subscribes to Foxtel “just for the footy, mate.” This is on everyone who 
> purchases Murdoch newspapers. This is on millennials who don’t register to 
> vote because they think the system sucks. This is on boomers who couldn’t 
> care less about modern problems and future planning because it won’t affect 
> them. This is on everyone who thinks Australian politics is boring and 
> doesn’t matter. You did this.
> 
> I hope you’re happy.


-- 
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
T: +61 2 61402408  M: +61 404072753
mailto:[email protected]  aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request 




_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to