"The European Union has published new guidelines on developing ethical AI"
https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/8/18300149/eu-artificial-intelligence-ai-ethical-guidelines-recommendations
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=58477
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/eu-sets-artificial-intelligence-guidelines
Jevan.
On Sun. 26-May-19 3:42 pm, Roger Clarke wrote:
On 25/5/19 7:22 am, Roger Clarke wrote:
[I'll shortly run the ruler over the OECD Principles, using as a
yardstick the collation of 10 Themes and 50 Principles ...
The score is disappointing - 40%, not the 50-70% I'd anticipated.
Feedback gratefully received:
http://rogerclarke.com/EC/AI-OECD-Eval.html
______________
OECD Announces AI Principles, 42 Nations Endorse
EPIC Alert 26.09
May 24, 2019
https://epic.org/alert/epic_alert_26.09.html#_1.__
The OECD this week announced the OECD Principles on Artificial
Intelligence, the first international standard for AI, with the
backing of 42 countries. The OECD AI principles make central "the
rule of law, human rights and democratic values" and set out
requirements for fairness, accountability and transparency.
OECD Secretary-General Guerra said the OECD AI principles "place the
interests of people at its heart." Guerra also quoted Alan Turing,
who once said, "We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can
see plenty there that needs to be done." Civil society groups,
working through the CSISAC, played a key role in the development of
the OECD AI Principles as did the EPIC Public Voice project.
Earlier this year, EPIC President Marc Rotenberg commended the US
administration for backing the OECD process, but also wrote in the
New York Times that there is much more to be done. "The United States
must work with other democratic countries to establish red lines for
certain AI applications and ensue fairness, accountability, and
transparency as AI systems are deployed," EPIC's Rotenberg wrote.
EPIC has also proposed the Universal Guidelines for Artificial
Intelligence as the basis for AI legislation. The Guidelines aim to
reduce bias in decisionmaking algorithms, to ensure that digital
globalization is inclusive, to create human-centered evidence-based
policy, to promote safety in AI deployment, and to rebuild trust in
institutions. The Universal Guidelines have been endorsed by more
than 250 experts and 60 organizations in 40 countries.
_____
OECD (2019) 'Recommendation of the Council on Artificial
Intelligence' Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,
22 May 2019, at
https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
Principles for responsible stewardship of trustworthy AI
1.1.Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being
Stakeholders should proactively engage in responsible stewardship of
trustworthy AI in pursuit of beneficial outcomes for people and the
planet, such as augmenting human capabilities and enhancing
creativity, advancing inclusion of underrepresented populations,
reducing economic, social, gender and other inequalities, and
protecting natural environments, thus invigorating inclusive growth,
sustainable development and well-being.
1.2.Human-centred values and fairness
a)AI actors should respect the rule of law, human rights and
democratic values, throughout the AI system lifecycle. These include
freedom, dignity and autonomy, privacy and data protection,
non-discrimination and equality, diversity, fairness, social justice,
and internationally recognised labour rights.
b)To this end, AI actors should implement mechanisms and safeguards,
such as capacity for human determination, that are appropriate to the
context and consistent with the state of art.
1.3.Transparency and explainability
AI Actors should commit to transparency and responsible disclosure
regarding AI systems. To this end, they should provide meaningful
information, appropriate to the context, and consistent with the
state of art:
i.to foster a general understanding of AI systems,
ii.to make stakeholders aware of their interactions with AI systems,
including in the workplace,
iii.to enable those affected by an AI system to understand the
outcome, and,
iv.to enable those adversely affected by an AI system to challenge
its outcome based on plain and easy-to-understand information on the
factors, and the logic that served as the basis for the prediction,
recommendation or decision.
1.4.Robustness, security and safety
a)AI systems should be robust, secure and safe throughout their
entire lifecycle so that, in conditions of normal use, foreseeable
use or misuse, or other adverse conditions, they function
appropriately and do not pose unreasonable safety risk.
b)To this end, AI actors should ensure traceability, including in
relation to datasets, processes and decisions made during the AI
system lifecycle, to enable analysis of the AI system’s outcomes and
responses to inquiry, appropriate to the context and consistent with
the state of art.
c)AI actors should, based on their roles, the context, and their
ability to act, apply a systematic risk management approach to each
phase of the AI system lifecycle on a continuous basis to address
risks related to AI systems, including privacy, digital security,
safety and bias.
1.5.Accountability
AI actors should be accountable for the proper functioning of AI
systems and for the respect of the above principles, based on their
roles, the context, and consistent with the state of art.
--
Signature
Volunteer Work Only (but you can make money)
MIT SE (UC), GradDip IT (UC), BSc (ANU),
GradCert Rsch Methods & Des (UC)
I am here for online friends, hobbies, volunteer work, and working on
business ideas, and I am on Centrelink Disability Support Pension
(Schizophrenia & Aspergers). I suspect that what will probably work is
people who are on a Centrelink payment such as unemployed, disability,
or retired, since they can benefit from me and since it allows me to
give back to Centrelink, and also, if female friends then age 49+ and
less attractive so that they will find me attractive, also probably
overweight since I am overweight. However I can also work with highly
skilled people since I can make use of what I get from them that is
useful for me to be able to work with interesting concepts. Me:
Computing Researcher, Self Employed, Innovation, Management, Canberra
Australia. Interests: Especially things involving the use of a computer.
Creating, Doing, Improvising, Analysing for Improvement: Computer
Programming Open Source including C#/VB.NET, CSS, HTML, Javascript, MS
Visual Studio, My/MS Sql, PHP, WinForms, WPF. 3d animation, Acting
Improvisations, Audio Podcasts, Business & Startups, Chat, Creative
Writing & Poetry, Creativity, Dancing, Debating, Decisions, Digital Art,
Discussion of Topics, Electronic Music Composition/Creation (FL Studio),
Engineering, Friends, Ideas, Information Analysis, Innovation, IT
Tuition, Jazz Piano, Jazz Singing Male Baritone & Choir & Karaoke,
Management, PC Support, Photography, Public Speaking, Reading online
science magazines and emails, Research, Science, Making YouTube Videos.
Friendship with adults via phone, Email, Online Chat, anything we can
make and send each other and collaborate on. Note: For our interactions,
collaborations, hobbies, volunteer work, etc to turn out successful, it
may be necessary for there to be a financial cost to me in order for you
or your organization to make it work, so let me know what you suggest.
Web: http://www.jevan.com.au/
Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: (02) 6152 8010 (or +61 2 6152 8010)
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jevanpipitone
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jevanpipitone
GitHub: http://www.github.com/jevanpipitone
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jevanpipitone
Canberra, Australia
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
