https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/12/20691957/mastodon-decentralized-social-network-gab-migration-fediverse-app-blocking

> Mastodon was built to be a kinder, more decentralized version of Twitter — 
> then Gab showed up

> Over the past few years, Mastodon has become the model for a friendlier kind 
> of social network, promising to keep out the hateful or ugly content that 
> proliferates on larger and more centralized networks. Journalists hailed it 
> as “Twitter without Nazis” and for years, it’s generally lived up to that 
> promise. But last week, the social network Gab migrated to Mastodon — and 
> Mastodon’s admins have been forced to deal with the internet’s Nazi problem 
> head-on.
> 
> The response has been messy. Many prominent Mastodon servers already moderate 
> against racism, so Gab has faced a wave of individual blocks from individual 
> servers. But going further has proven controversial, exposing profound 
> questions within the community. Before the migration, one user requested that 
> Mastodon add a hard-coded ban of Gab’s servers, so all instances would 
> automatically cut it off. It was an extreme measure, but one they argued was 
> warranted. “Gab has inspired mass shooters and murders,” they wrote. “You do 
> not understand the type of threat they represent.”
> 
> Mastodon founder Eugen “Gargron” Rochko, meanwhile, believes a scorched-Earth 
> campaign against Gab’s fork of Mastodon isn’t practical. “You have to 
> understand it’s not actually possible to do anything platform-wide because 
> it’s decentralized,” he tells The Verge. “I don’t have the control.”
> 
> It’s a hard problem, playing off the deepest limitations of decentralized 
> projects like Mastodon. Mastodon arose from the idealistic open-source 
> software movement, designed to let anybody run their own social media site. 
> But it was never intended to support something like Gab. While Gab has no 
> official political affiliation, it’s known as a haven for far-right or 
> explicitly fascist users too extreme for bigger networks. Its hands-off 
> moderation approach is antithetical to many supporters of Mastodon, whose 
> creator has officially stated he’s “completely opposed to Gab’s project and 
> philosophy.”
> 
> For parts of Mastodon, Gab’s move is an unfortunate byproduct of running an 
> open platform. For others, it’s an existential threat — or an opportunity to 
> take a moral stand.

> Mastodon looks like Twitter at first glance. Users can post 500-character 
> messages called “toots” (a name chosen by an early financial backer), repost 
> or “boost” messages on their own timeline, and follow or privately message 
> other users. But instead of a single site run by a company, it’s a software 
> platform built on the open-source ActivityPub protocol. “Mastodon is 
> essentially a way to host a social media website,” explains Rochko.
> 
> Since its launch in 2016, Mastodon users have set up thousands of these 
> websites. (One unofficial directory lists around 2,500 as currently online.) 
> They include generalist forums like Rochko’s own Mastodon.Social, as well as 
> interest-based communities like Fosstodon — for open-source software 
> enthusiasts — and Sinblr, for exiled Tumblr porn creators. Some instances are 
> essentially experiments, like Dolphin.Town, where posts must contain only the 
> letter “e.”
> 
> Many Mastodon instances hold users to a higher standard than bigger social 
> networks. On Gab, meanwhile, users post a striking amount of hate content and 
> have protested even very limited moderation. As of this writing, the Gab 
> timeline’s first page features a warning about “International Jewry,” a 
> string of posts with the hashtags “#eugenism” and “#ethnostate,” and a 
> political cartoon of four lynched bodies (marked with an LGBT Pride rainbow, 
> a Star of David, a Black Power fist, and a feminist symbol) above the caption 
> “SOON.”
> 
> Mastodon isn’t a social networking website — it’s a way to host one yourself
> Some Gab content has crossed the line into criminal activity. The UK jailed 
> two teenage neo-Nazis in June for posting terrorist propaganda. Florida 
> police also arrested a user last month for posting racist threats and 
> possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. And in 2018, a man posted an 
> anti-Semitic Gab message just before killing 11 members of a synagogue in 
> Pittsburgh. Gab denies that it condones hatred — CEO Andrew Torba says it 
> simply allows  any speech that’s “legal in the United States” with a few 
> exceptions. It correctly notes that Facebook and Twitter also contain hate 
> speech and violent threats. Gab is far smaller than these sites, however, and 
> its bad posts are particularly concentrated.
> 
> When Gab migrated to Mastodon, that content threatened to spill into the 
> larger platform. Mastodon is organized into a “Fediverse,” which means that 
> users on one instance can follow and interact with users from another. It 
> helps make Mastodon feel like a single community, but by default, it could 
> make users from one instance vulnerable to trolls from another. Fortunately, 
> administrators can block instances, too, keeping out any posts or users from 
> that server.
> 
> So far, that’s been the default response to Gab. Mastodon’s official site 
> will only list instances that follow the Mastodon Server Covenant. The 
> covenant mandates “active moderation against racism, sexism, homophobia, and 
> transphobia” — which pretty much nixes any contact with Gab. For Rochko, it 
> seems like the clearest way forward. “The software that powers Mastodon is 
> released under an open-source free software license, which means anybody can 
> use it,” he says. “And you know, that offers a great number of benefits — but 
> some disadvantages.”
> 
> If you join a major Mastodon instance right now, chances are you won’t be 
> connected to Gab. “All the admins that I know, that I interact with myself, 
> have already blocked Gab,” says Rochko — including Mastodon.Social. 
> “Essentially, they’re isolated.”


> Gab may not need the Fediverse. It’s not dependent on Mastodon for hosting, 
> payment processing, domain registration, or other basic infrastructure. While 
> a recent Motherboard article quotes Gab saying it’s become “unstoppable” 
> thanks to Mastodon, Mastodon really seems to solve one big problem: mobile 
> app access.
> 
> Apple and Google both kicked Gab out of their app stores years ago. Moving to 
> Mastodon gives users a built-in suite of apps to choose from, filling one of 
> the social network’s biggest feature gaps. Gab had apparently returned to the 
> Google Play Store as of July 10th, but even so, the Mastodon protocol ensures 
> that users have lots of backup options if it’s banned again.
> 
> This has turned app access into a battlefield. Developers can lock Gab out by 
> disabling login options to the instance or completely blocking content from 
> its servers. And several have done just that. Mastodon lists six major mobile 
> apps on its homepage. Four of them — the Android client Tusky and the iOS 
> apps Toot!, Mast, and Amaroq — block Gab in some fashion.
> 
> “If hate speech is masquerading as free speech on an app I’ve built, it’s 
> upon myself to somehow moderate that.”
> Amaroq developer John Gabelmann banned Gab to avoid potential problems with 
> the App Store. “My core objective is to keep Amaroq publicly available and to 
> abide by all Apple policies, which keep unmoderated extremist/hateful content 
> off the store,” he tells The Verge. “If your network is large enough and 
> unmoderated enough to get the negative attention of Apple, Amaroq will follow 
> Apple’s policies.”
> 
> Mast’s creator Shihab Mehboob, by contrast, blocked Gab after users requested 
> it. He’s gotten one-star reviews from angry Gab users, but “if hate speech is 
> masquerading as free speech on an app I’ve built, it’s upon myself to somehow 
> moderate that and reduce it where possible,” he says. “I understand that the 
> Fediverse is intended to be open and entirely at the user’s discretion as to 
> what they want to see/use/partake in, but that shouldn’t cover Nazi-based 
> ideologies. There has to be a line drawn somewhere.”
> 
> “If Google wants to ban it, they should start from their Chrome web browser.”
> Other app developers maintain that this blocking doesn’t fit Mastodon’s 
> mission. The Android-based Fedilab app’s free version initially blocked Gab 
> because of Play Store content policy fears. But the ban has since been 
> lifted. “I will simply not block instances with the app,” wrote Fedilab’s 
> developer. “I clearly think that’s not my role … If you want a strong block, 
> it’s in the hands of social network developers or your admins.”
> 
> And the developer of Subway Tooter, who goes by Tateisu, is skeptical that 
> stores will censure apps for supporting Gab. “They can run their web app on a 
> web browser,” Tateisu points out. “If Google wants to ban it, they should 
> start from their Chrome web browser.”

> Gab calls itself the largest Mastodon instance, boasting over a million 
> accounts before migration. That number is almost double the user base of the 
> previous largest listed instance, Japanese-language forum Pawoo.net, and 
> triple the base of Mastodon.Social, the next-largest instance.
> 
> Rochko disputes the million-account statistic, since people signed up for 
> those accounts before Gab moved to Mastodon, and we don’t know how many of 
> them are still active. He also notes that Mastodon communities are often 
> intentionally small; some limit registration or stop accepting new users 
> after a certain point. While Gab has sought status as a direct peer of the 
> “Big Tech” sites it loathes, Mastodon’s big draw is intimacy — four days 
> after the migration, programmer Darius Kazemi published a guide specifically 
> extolling the virtues of tiny communities.
> 
> Some Gab users have reveled in the idea that they’re invading the platform. 
> One illustrated the move with a shot from The Shining, labeling an 
> axe-wielding Jack Nicholson “Gab” and tagging a screaming Shelley Duvall as 
> Mastodon. But joining Mastodon isn’t like flooding a traditional, centralized 
> social network. If most instances block Gab, being one of the largest 
> Mastodon nodes could be more like becoming the largest group to build a site 
> with WordPress or start a workspace on Slack: more of a bragging right than a 
> takeover.
> 
> Gab calls itself the biggest Mastodon node, but it’s complicated
> It’s unclear how much Gab users are interacting with other parts of the 
> Fediverse. The administrators of one prominent Mastodon instance, who asked 
> not to be named out of fear of harassment, said they had not noticed 
> Gab-related activity on their server. On the other hand, another admin who 
> spoke anonymously said they had seen “an increasing number of reports from 
> users about people picking fights and harassing users — mostly over 
> transgender issues.”
> 
> Even without direct action, the administrator said that the basic anxiety of 
> having Gab on the Fediverse has put people on edge. When one user misgendered 
> another genuinely by mistake, the admin mentioned, they were also dogpiled 
> with accusations of coming from Gab. “People are acting more paranoid, but I 
> can’t say I blame them.”
> 
> Mastodon has certainly faced problems before Gab. Among other things, The 
> Daily Dot reported early this year that some marginalized users felt ignored 
> or underappreciated on the platform, including some who said they left 
> because of problems with Rochko’s development process. But Gab’s migration 
> seems to hit at the core of Mastodon’s mission, setting two founding 
> principles — safety and openness — at odds with each other.
> 
> Even Gab’s de facto defenders don’t tend to argue much about its content. 
> (The creator of Subway Tooter apologized for coming off as insensitive about 
> “the Nazi problem.”) Instead, the battle lines seem drawn over whether to 
> help individual users and admins avoid interacting with the instance, or 
> whether to push Gab away from Mastodon as far as possible by any means 
> necessary.
> 
> Mastodon is meant to be open — but it also wants to be safe
> When Tusky blocked Gab, a poster on repository F-Droid suggested that the app 
> should no longer be considered free software — saying that even if Tusky met 
> the letter of open source law, it violated its spirit by building censorship 
> into the code. Another user countered by asking for a “promotes bigotry” flag 
> on Fedilab for allowing Gab logins. “This isn’t about freedom of speech. It’s 
> about the enabling of hatred towards specific groups,” wrote the user, who 
> says that she’s been assaulted for being a transgender woman. “I’m not asking 
> for apps to block, only to know which apps aren’t actively fighting against 
> intolerance of others.”
> 
> Mastodon’s conundrum is a microcosm of a much larger conflict online. The 
> internet has given billions of people a way to amplify their voices, but the 
> trade-offs have become tangible. Abolishing gatekeepers can allow 
> misinformation and hate to flourish. Uncensored online forums can become 
> co-opted by bigots and harassers, silencing their less powerful targets. And 
> in the face of violent supremacist movements targeting real people, openness 
> — once an uncontroversial pillar of internet culture — can seem like a 
> hopelessly abstract principle.
> 
> Right now, Mastodon and its members are navigating between two bad options. 
> If they completely ignore Gab, they could end up as a less welcoming 
> community for marginalized people. But if they go to war, they risk 
> fracturing Mastodon in the process. And either way, for the moment, Gab has 
> arguably upstaged the work of admins and developers who have been nurturing 
> their communities for years.
> 
> At the end of my conversation with Rochko, I ask if he has any last comments. 
> “It’s just unfortunate that these are the circumstances that we’re talking 
> about Mastodon again,” he tells me. “I would much prefer it was something 
> specifically about Mastodon. Rather than, you know, Gab.”



-- 
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
T: +61 2 61402408  M: +61 404072753
mailto:[email protected]  aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request 




_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to