> ... Health and Welfare Data Asset can ... have unintended > consequences.
This might be old news, but I would very much recommend taking a look at the work of Chris Culnane of U. Melb. and his colleagues. https://culnane.org/#dataprivacy https://dblp.org/pers/hd/c/Culnane:Chris He fairly recently gave a very interesting talk here, covering privacy issues arising from cryptographical ignorance on the part of various government, academic and corporate organizations. The first part of his talk was on the danger posed to voting in elections and referendums by the use of TLS proxying services by Oz and NZ governments, extending so far as to the NZ gov. receiving referendum results from over-seas entirely unencrypted (and presumably unverifiable). They refused to correct the fallacious statement on their web-site pretending all data was encrypted from voter to electoral office. You might want to take a look at his article ``Trust Implications of DDoS Protection in Online Elections.'' https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00991 The latter half related how confusion of hashing with encryption has caused a number of organizations to release (illegally) personal data w/o consent, being under the false impression that it is `anonymized.' You might like to have a read of some of his articles written with Ben Rubinstein. If you get the chance to see him talk, I'd very strongly encourage you to go. I've no idea if he gives seminars often or where. Maybe you could ask him. _______________________________________________ Link mailing list Link@mailman.anu.edu.au http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link