On 9/4/20 9:03 pm, David Boxall wrote:
A different perspective:
https://medium.com/@jamesjansson/covid-19-modelling-is-wrong-f7246e3dc396

It's an interesting piece of work.

But it embodies the same fundamental error as the approach that it's criticising. He's saying:

        'my modelling tool is better than your modelling tool'

But it's still 'applied science', and not 'instrumentalist' science.

Applied science is characterised by the old saw:

  'when you have a hammer in your hand, everything looks like a nail'

It's driven by the tools that the individual or group has to hand, and which they're used to working with.

Instrumentalist science instead addresses problems and seeks solutions.

So the first thing that's done is problem-analysis. With the shape of the problem understood, tools can then be evaluated to see how well they fit the problem.

To be fair, properly-understood real-world problems are often more complex than any available tool can cope with.

And that's clearly the case with a pandemic - or even an epidemic within a single, moderately homogeneous and relatively independent environment.

But to start with a preferred tool and then conceive the problem within the constraints of that tool is to condemn the project to failure.

In this case, the Susceptible, Exposed, Infected, Recovered (SEIR) notion is patently inadequate, e.g.
-   Infected needs to be exploded into at least the levels of
    {Asymptomatic, Symptomatic, Hospitalised, ICU'd, In Recovery}
-   New instances need to be able to be fed into intermediate states
    (e.g. ailing crew flown in from the offshore vessels)
-   a heap (technical term) for the Dead seems to be missing entirely
-   Recovered fails to distinguish {With Strong Antibodies, Other}

I haven't done much deterministic simulation, nor Monte Carlo simulation, since the 1970s.

But if you don't clearly distinguish the start-point(s), the states, the transitions, and the end-point(s), and if you don't identify the attributes of each instance (age-range and relevant-prior-conditions, for example), and the postulated distributions of the variables, you're just playing games, not assisting decision-makers.


At the end, Jansson write:

> ... I would caution against relying too heavily on modelling ...

Well said, that man!

Modelling is a decision support tool, and has to be treated that way.


He continues:

> I do not fault the governments of the world acting decisively on the basis of the modelling provided so far or the actions taken. Fast action is an absolute necessity and interventions such as isolation can buy society time until we determine the best path forward.

Yep, agreed with that bit too.


Obiter dicta:

I suspect that the moderately effective rather than absolute isolation, with an emphasis on staying away from the old and infirm, was an effective means of greatly reducing the death-toll, while allowing steady build-up towards herd-immunity - which I suspect is likely to be achieved before an immunisation option is available.

I also think they set the 'scare-tactics' at about the right decibels - to 'alert' people's thoughts and actions, but keep the 'alarm' factor under control.

And, to the credit of the people responsible for this in Australia, they've shown some adaptation to new information and alternative modelling.

And now we want them to exercise just as effective judgement during the peak (this week) and the wind-down phases (starting late this week, but very gently, slowly and steadily).

Hopefully the current break-out by the Laura Norder monsters, seeking heaps more surveillance and social control powers and resources while they can still use the virus as a pretext, will be a short phase that won't provide Dutton and his ilk any more scope to undermine democracy.


--
Roger Clarke                            mailto:roger.cla...@xamax.com.au
T: +61 2 6288 6916   http://www.xamax.com.au  http://www.rogerclarke.com

Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law            University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science    Australian National University
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to