https://www.zdnet.com/article/ripe-opposes-chinas-internet-protocols-upgrade-plan/

> RIPE speaks out against China and Huawei's "New IP" internet upgrade plan, 
> says internet standards should be left to the IETF, not the UN.
> 
> Catalin Cimpanu
> 
> By Catalin Cimpanu for Zero Day | April 23, 2020 -- 20:40 GMT (06:40 AEST) | 
> Topic: Networking
> DDoS botnet internet globe map
> 
> EU-based Internet governance body RIPE is opposing a proposal to remodel core 
> internet protocols, a proposal backed by the Chinese government, Chinese 
> telecoms, and Chinese networking equipment vendor Huawei.
> 
> Named "New IP," this proposal[1, 2, 3] consists of a revamped version of the 
> TCP/IP standards to accommodate new technologies, a "shutoff protocol" to cut 
> off misbehaving parts of the internet, and a new "top-to-bottom" governance 
> model that centralizes the internet and puts it into the hands of a few 
> crucial node operators.
> 
> The New IP proposal was submitted last year to the International 
> Telecommunication Union (ITU) and brought to the public's attention following 
> a Financial Times report last month (paywalled, see alternative coverage 
> here).
> 
> The proposal received immediate criticism from the general public and privacy 
> advocates due to its obvious attempt to hide internet censorship features 
> behind a technical redesign of the TCP/IP protocol stack.
> 
> The New IP proposal was described as the Chinese government's attempt to 
> export and impose its autocratic views onto the rest of the internet and its 
> infrastructure. Authoritarian countries like Iran, Russia, and Saudi Arabia 
> expressed support for the proposal.
> RIPE says internet standards should be left to the IETF
> 
> In a blog post this week, RIPE NCC, the regional Internet registry for 
> Europe, West Asia, and the former USSR, formally expressed a public opinion 
> against China New IP proposal.
> 
> "Do we need New IP? I don't think we do," said Marco Hogewoning, the current 
> acting Manager Public Policy and Internet Governance at the RIPE NCC.
> 
> "Although certain technical challenges exist with the current Internet model, 
> I do not believe that we need a whole new architecture to address them."
> 
> Hogewoning says that any endeavors to revamp internet protocols should be 
> left to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the international body 
> that has been in charge of defining internet standards for decades. Such 
> issues should not be left to the ITU, which is the United Nation's 
> telecommunications body, and an agency where political influence rules, 
> rather than technically-sound arguments.
> 
> In addition, RIPE is also concerned with the attempt to change the internet's 
> current decentralized nature.
> 
> In a document with a harsher tone RIPE sent to the ITU in February, the 
> organization expressed its concerns about the New IP proposal.
> 
> "The RIPE NCC is deeply concerned by what has been proposed here," Hogewoning 
> said. "We are especially concerned by the notion that this proposal 
> represents an opportunity to steer away from the traditional 'bottom-up' 
> decision-making model.
> 
> "We also believe the technical rationale presented is flawed and find the 
> suggested alternative designs to be both unrealistic and unproven."
> 
> Going forward, Hogewoning urges national internet governance organizations to 
> reach out to local decision-makers and recommend that they vote against the 
> New IP proposal, which is set to enter into testing in 2021, and go under a 
> vote at a later date.
> 
> "For now, what is most important is that we, as an industry, state our needs 
> and let decision makers know that New IP is not what we need," the RIPE 
> manager said.
> 
> "Talk to your government representatives at the ITU and elsewhere and make 
> sure they understand that this proposal is not about a real need for new 
> technology, but about trying to alter the governance structure of the 
> Internet."



-- 
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
T: +61 2 61402408  M: +61 404072753
mailto:[email protected]  aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to