On 19/6/20 9:34 pm, Roger Clarke wrote:
... Below is the "alert notification" I received ...
You were the *sender* of the message? The system at one of the
recipients *replied* to your message?
Apart from being a bit big brotherish, that would seem to go against
normal security and risk mitigation principles. Normally messages are
checked for spam and viruses with warnings attached for the recipient.
You don't alert the sender, as they could use this to learn to get
around the checks.
Having a bot reply to the sender with a critique seems a legal risk, as
the organization which was running the bot would be liable for what the
bot wrote.
Having the bot filter messages, particularly problematic for a medical
organization, as there are technical terms which can be misconstrued as
profanity, and also slang terms may need to be used with patients for
clarity. Such filtering could result in miscommunication with fatal
consequences.
--
Tom Worthington, MEd FHEA FACS CP IP3P http://www.tomw.net.au
+61(0)419496150
TomW Communications Pty Ltd. PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617, Australia
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Prof. Standards Legislation
Honorary Lecturer, Computer Science, Australian National University
https://cecs.anu.edu.au/research/profile/tom-worthington
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
