Decode China: US backs Chinese-language news site in Australia as battle of the 
narratives heats up

“Decode China” will operate under an arrangement with the US Department of 
State and the London-based Institute for War & Peace Reporting

The venture has been linked to critics of Beijing and comes amid tensions over 
Hong Kong, trade and claims of spying

By John Power  Published: 11th July, 2020   
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3092738/decode-china-us-backs-chinese-language-news-site-australia


A US government-backed media outlet is preparing to launch a Chinese-language 
news service in Australia, signalling a potential shake-up in the battle of 
narratives around China and its hotly debated influence in the country.

Decode China will operate a Chinese-language website under an arrangement with 
the US Department of State and the Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR), 
according to disclosures on the Australian government’s public register of 
foreign influence.

The new media outlet was chosen as a “sub-awardee” of IWPR, a non-profit 
organisation that “works with the US Department of State to disseminate and 
manage grants around the world”, according to the disclosures.

The London-based charity describes its mission as to help journalists and civil 
society “speak out” through training, mentoring and other support programmes in 
“countries in conflict, crisis and transition around the world”. In 2016, it 
received US$13.6 million in grants and donations from sources in the United 
States, Britain and the Netherlands, according to its annual report that year.

The venture comes at a time of heightened tensions between Canberra and 
Beijing, whose relations have been strained by a raft of disputes spanning 
issues including Hong Kong, trade, allegations of espionage, and racist 
incidents targeting Asians in Australia.

In the latest test of ties, Canberra on Thursday suspended its extradition 
treaty with Hong Kong and announced a pathway to permanent residency for 
Hongkongers as a response to the city’s controversial national security law, 
prompting a rebuke from Beijing for interfering in its “internal affairs”.

While Decode China’s mission, coverage focus and details such as launch date 
remain under wraps, prominent Chinese-Australians known for their criticism of 
Beijing have been linked to the project.

Corporate records identify Feng Chongyi, an associate professor at the 
University of Technology, Sydney, and Wai Ling Yeung, former head of Chinese 
Studies at Curtin University, as directors of Sydney-based Decode China Pty Ltd.

Feng, an Australian permanent resident born in Hainan, has written critically 
of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s leadership and Beijing’s influence over 
Chinese communities overseas.

In 2017, he was interrogated and prevented from leaving China for days while on 
a visit to the country. Yeung has sounded the alarm about Beijing “dominating 
the Chinese-language media”, and researched the activities of the United Front 
Work Department, which manages outreach to Chinese communities abroad, for the 
Jamestown Foundation, a Washington-based think tank.

Maree Ma, general manager of Chinese-language media group Vision Times, which 
has published articles critical of the Chinese Communist Party, is listed as 
secretary of the company.

Feng said he did not know when Decode China would launch or what his eventual 
involvement would be, as the project was in the planning stages. He declined to 
comment on the outlet’s goals or backers, citing a need to wait for official 
announcements.

Yeung, Ma and the IWPR did not respond to requests for comment.

The venture appears set to shake up a Chinese-language market seen by critics 
as too dominated by voices friendly towards Beijing.

Many of the biggest media groups – including Sydney-based Chinese Newspaper 
Group and Melbourne-headquartered Global CAMG Media Group – behind the dozens 
of websites, newspapers and broadcasters that cater to Australia’s estimated 
600,000 Mandarin speakers are part-owned by Chinese state-owned media such as 
China Radio International.

A 2016 study by the Australia-China Relations Institute found Chinese-language 
media’s coverage of China over the past two decades had changed from being 
“mostly critical” to “representations that are sympathetic or even supportive”, 
alongside a shift in inward migration away from Hong Kong and Taiwan towards 
mainland China.

The study, carried out by University of Technology Sydney professor Wanning 
Sun, said “sensitive news” stories involving issues such as Tibet and the Falun 
Gong were often ignored and Chinese propaganda had “become to some extent 
integrated with Chinese media in Australia”.

“As most of them are commercial organisations, they respond to commercial 
pressures,” said Yun Jiang, a former Australian public servant who now serves 
as director of the China Policy Centre.

“So they have to consider how their viewers and advertisers would respond to 
their content. It is possible for the Chinese government to put pressure on 
advertisers in order to pressure the media companies.

“However, it is also possible that its attitude to the Chinese government 
reflects the audience of the readers, as the more recent migrants may have a 
more favourable view of Beijing than the earlier waves of migrants.”

Vicky Xu, an analyst with Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), said 
the site could fill an “urgent demand for Chinese-language news outlets here 
that are capable of taking a critical position”.

“The site’s popularity will be dependent on how it’s run and which stories it 
chooses to cover,” said Xu, whose institute is part-funded by Australia’s 
Department of Defence, the US State Department and Britain’s Foreign and 
Commonwealth Office.

“But no doubt by the sound of it the outlet has much potential.”

Xu acknowledged the site would likely face questions about bias towards 
Washington, but drew a distinction between funding from US sources and money 
from Beijing, which she accused of not respecting “separation of power and the 
notion of checks and balances”.

However, Jon von Kowallis, a Chinese studies professor at the University of New 
South Wales Sydney, said the internet had already made a wide variety of 
information sources available to Chinese speakers in Australia.

“Chinese readers in Australia can and should consult a number of different 
sources and then make up their own minds what they think about what is going on 
in China and Australia,” von Kowallis said.

The emergence of Decode China also comes on the heels of the launch in October 
of APAC News, founded by businessman and consultant Marcus Reubenstein, which 
has attracted attention with coverage lauding the benefits of Chinese trade and 
investment and criticising Beijing’s critics.

APAC News, which is funded by reader subscriptions and says on its website it 
rejects all government advertising, also describes itself as a “strong advocate 
for a vitally important economic relationship and for 1.2 million people of 
Chinese heritage who’ve made Australia their home”.

The site, which publishes in English and Chinese, was positively cited last 
week by state-run China Daily during a Chinese Foreign Ministry media briefing 
after it published an article detailing ASPI’s funding sources.

During the briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said ASPI, 
which regularly produces research critical of Beijing, had been “criticised by 
many, including those with vision in Australia, for what it has done”.

According to his LinkedIn profile, Reubenstein, a former television news 
producer who has travelled extensively in China, is the founder of consultancy 
Red Door Asia, billed as a facilitator of “business-to-business and 
business-to-people communication between China and Australasia”.

He is named as the author of a number of articles about Australia-China 
economic ties published by China’s state media, and has made several 
appearances on state-run China Global Television Network.

In an interview with CGTN in February, Sydney-based Reubenstein criticised 
Western media for its “negative tone” about China.

“I think one of the challenges for China – and certainly I see it constantly in 
mainstream media reporting on China in Australia – [is] reporting can’t 
separate the Chinese government, the Chinese economy, the Chinese trade 
situation, from the Chinese people. It’s regarded as this homogenous state,” he 
said.

Reubenstein declined to comment to This Week in Asia
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to