On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 07:29:37PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > > I've rebased and improved my links-2.2 IPv6 patch for links 2.3. > > I rebased it for 2.3, too, for Debian about a month or two ago: > > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/links2/2.3-1/ipv6.diff > > > Main features are adaptation of FTP client and proper handling of > > link local addresses. > > What about the issue described at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645166 ? > I know my patch for links-2.2 did not work properly.
Rebase to 2.3 was easy, but then I spent a lot of time reviewing it line per line and finding any discrepancies. I think I fixed all of them now. I performed a lot of tests with domain names, numeric addresses, with port, without port, over SSL, with link local addresses, over HTTP proxy, in passive and in active FTP mode, with IPv6 only servers, with IPv4 only server, with dual-stacked server. And all of them work for me with patch (links-2.3-ipv6-2.diff.gz) advertized in this thread. I'm able to reproduce the reported bug with Debian patch. I can confirm it does not exhibit with my patch. Just try it! Maybe you want to hear how to fix links-2.2. I think easier solution is to back-port the 2.3 patch. However if you insisted on pure bug-fixing patch, I could send you git patch set of all my changes in links-2.3. It's not one big commit :) -- Petr
pgpFKsRaxB3t7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ links-list mailing list links-list@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/links-list
