In ortp the timestamp comparisons are done with macros 
(TIMESTAMP_IS_NEWER_THAN) that take account the wrap-around.
No matter to worry.

Simon

Le Thursday 25 October 2007 21:44:09 Greg, vous avez écrit :
> I'm looking in  the ortp code wondering what happens when the timestamp and
> the sequence numbers exceed the 32 and 16 bit values respectively, and
> can't find any info on it. How does ortp handle this. do they just go back
> to zero or what does the RFC say and is this implemented in librotp?
> thanks,
> greg
>
>  __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com




_______________________________________________
Linphone-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users

Reply via email to