> > I am sorry, but I tried with the today's git checkout > (6b23aeb56f16a39d6a0c960a0dc3242b0c06c2a8, that's svn 615 if I > understand the URL correctly) and the result is exactly the same (both > with and without STUN). Not found for registration and service not > available for calling, and linphone seems to suggest that it is actually > on 192.168.1.*. See attached logs.
Don't confuse STUN and setting the gateway address. If you use STUN, then stun is used to discover the RTP ports, not the SIP port. If you choose the second option (specify nat address), then you force linphone to claim it is reachable using the supplied address inconditionnaly. Stun is not used at all. Simon > > Best, > > Matěj _______________________________________________ Linphone-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
