Hi,
Thanks for your support.Now i removed this line
"file://b64_assert.patch;patch=1" from linphone_3.1.0.bb file.and if i
recompile again i am getting the GTK error as follows.
checking for LIBGTK... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 >=
2.4.0 gthread-2.0) were not met:
|
| No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
|
| Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
| installed software in a non-standard prefix.
|
| Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBGTK_CFLAGS
| and LIBGTK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
| See the pkg-config man page for more details.
|
| FATAL: oe_runconf failed
NOTE: Task failed:
/home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff/build/oetmp/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/linphone-3.1.0-r1/temp/log.do_configure.23014
ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting
ERROR: Build of
/home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
linphone_3.1.0.bb do_configure failed
ERROR: Task 5
(/home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
linphone_3.1.0.bb, do_configure) failed
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 644 tasks of which 644 didn't need to be
rerun and 1 failed.
ERROR:
'/home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
linphone_3.1.0.bb' failed
with regards
vivek tambakad
>
>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send Linphone-users mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Linphone-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Build error while using linphone (vivek tambakad)
> 2. Re: where does this ?received? come from? (Lars T?uber)
> 3. Re: Build error while using linphone (Alastair Johnson)
> 4. Re: where does this ?received? come from? (Lars T?uber)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:00:57 +0530
> From: vivek tambakad <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Linphone-users] Build error while using linphone
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi ,
> I am compiling linphone for the compulab Em-x270 xsacle board.I
> get following errors in openembedded with the
> "bitbake linphone" command.
>
> NOTE: Task failed: Error:
>
> /home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff/openembedded/recipes/linphone/linphone-3.1.0/./b64_assert.patch
> not found.
> ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting
> ERROR: Build of
> /home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
> linphone_3.1.0.bb do_patch failed
> ERROR: Task 4
> (/home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
> linphone_3.1.0.bb, do_patch) failed
>
> Please guide me in this
>
> Regards
> vivek tambakad
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/linphone-users/attachments/20091204/d44e5c62/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:39:50 +0100
> From: Lars T?uber <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Linphone-users] where does this ?received? come from?
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:03:01 +0100 Simon Morlat <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Lars,
> >
> > Where did you get this Via header from ?
> > Wireshark, linphone logs, server logs ?
>
> it came from »linphonec -d1« log.
>
> > I would be suprised it is in linphone logs: received= is set by servers
> > (or the UAS part of the client, but not for registers since linphone
> > does accept incoming registers).
>
> At the moment I have no access to the tersting machine, but I'll test again
> with the registrar running on an different port. I suspect a transparent SIP
> proxy from the ISP in between, who changes the addresses silently.
>
> I'll have a look with the kamailio running on a different port an report
> again.
>
> > If it is in the server logs: it might be the server that adds it
> > automatically to recall where to send the register's response back.
> > If it is captured with wireshark running on the server's machine, then
> > that would mean that there is some kind of poorly intelligent NAT
> > between linphone and kamailio that is trying to make some SIP
> > proxying....
> > It arrives sometimes. sips (encrypted sip) would help in getting rid of
> > these stupid nats, but it's not yet supported in linphone.
>
> Is this on the todo list for the near future? BTW what about encrypted RTP?
>
> Best regards
> Lars
>
>
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > Le mercredi 25 novembre 2009 à 12:45 +0100, Lars Täuber a écrit :
> > > Hi Bent,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:38:13 +0100 Bent Bagger <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > Lars Täuber wrote:
> > > > > 192.168.178.20:6060
> ;rport=6060;branch=z9hG4bK2125513909;received=77.186.81.20^M
> > > > >
> > > > > Where does this received IP-address come from?
> > > > >
> > > > A lookup of the recieved IP gives this:
> > > >
> > > > b...@yosie:~> dig -x 77.186.81.20
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Does that give you any clue? Your ISP/SIp registrar?
> > >
> > > no thanks. My question was not clear enough, sorry.
> > > I meant where does linphone get to know about this ip-address from?
> > >
> > > Linphone contacts a sip registrar that I'm running myself (kamailio)
> but it registers a different ip address than it should be. The NATted
> address is similar (from the same subnet) but not the one that's mentioned
> in the received=.... line. That's why the registrar registers this client
> with a wrong address. That's one of my problems.
> > >
> > > So my conclusion is there is an additional transparent application
> level firewall from my provider in between, or what?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Lars
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linphone-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
> >
>
>
> --
> Schöne Grüße
> Lars Täuber
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:53:37 +0000
> From: Alastair Johnson <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Linphone-users] Build error while using linphone
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
>
> On Friday 04 December 2009, vivek tambakad wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > I am compiling linphone for the compulab Em-x270 xsacle board.I
> > get following errors in openembedded with the
> > "bitbake linphone" command.
> >
> > NOTE: Task failed: Error:
> >
> /home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff/openembedded/recipes/linphone/linphon
> > e-3.1.0/./b64_assert.patch not found.
> > ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting
> > ERROR: Build of
> > /home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
> > linphone_3.1.0.bb do_patch failed
> > ERROR: Task 4
> > (/home/vivek/development/em-x270/stuff//openembedded/recipes/linphone/
> > linphone_3.1.0.bb, do_patch) failed
> >
> > Please guide me in this
>
> This is an OE bug. There is either an error in OE's bitbake recipe, or a
> missing file in the OE tree. The recipe is telling bitbake to patch the
> linphone source with patch file
> openembedded/recipes/linphone/linphone-3.1.0/b64_assert.patch but the file
> isn't there. You can edit the recipe
> openembedded/recipes/linphone/linphone_3.1.0.bb to remove the offending
> reference:
>
> SRC_URI =
> "
> http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/linphone/3.1.x/sources/linphone-${PV}.tar.gz<http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/linphone/3.1.x/sources/linphone-$%7BPV%7D.tar.gz>
> \
> file://b64_assert.patch;patch=1 \ << remove this line
> file://preferences-segv.patch;patch=1 \
> "
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:52:31 +0100
> From: Lars T?uber <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Linphone-users] where does this ?received? come from?
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hallo again,
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:39:50 +0100 Lars Täuber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'll have a look with the kamailio running on a different port an report
> again.
>
> with kamailio running on a different port this problem is gone. The ip
> address in the received line is the one from the natting firewall.
> So I conclude it really was a sip-proxy in the network of the ISP
> processing traffic to port 5060.
>
> It's often like this, I need to explain my problem to someone else to get
> the right ideas.
>
> Thanks everybody
> Lars
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
>
>
> End of Linphone-users Digest, Vol 85, Issue 3
> *********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Linphone-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
