On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Xavion <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for sharing your views regarding pulseaudio. >> For you what is the main advantage of using pulseaudio compared to >> standart alsa ? >> > > Some people might dispute this statement, but PulseAudio is the Linux sound > server of the future. For me, its biggest strength is the GUI approach that > makes configuration much simpler. Since Linphone is a GUI application, it > makes sense to liaise with a sound server that has a native GUI. > > > In my opinion pulseaudio has a too big latency and is not appropriate for >> VOIP. >> > > Any current latency issues will probably be resolved in future releases of > PulseAudio. If there are no other significant problems, I think it'd be > wise for Linphone to support PulseAudio now, rather than continuing to lag > behind the times. Thanks for taking my opinions on this matter into > consideration. >
Let's wait then for the future releases of PulseAudio! :-) Dragos > _______________________________________________ > Linphone-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users > >
_______________________________________________ Linphone-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
