No, I wasn't. You can find a reference to the iLBC license change here<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Low_Bitrate_Codec> .
The new license is much better. On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Ilya Melinikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2014 11:47:33 Felix Lechner wrote: > > > Last I looked iLBC was licensed under the attached document. The > > > registration requirement for commercial users (which may include making a > > > work-related phone call) imposed an restriction I found unacceptable. > > > > May be you are talking about SILK? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SILK > > > > Its license is indeed uncertain. > > > > -- > > Ilya Melinikov > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linphone-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users > >
_______________________________________________ Linphone-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
